Mini-implant anchorage for en-masse retraction of maxillary anterior teeth: a clinical cephalometric study
- PMID: 19061808
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.10.025
Mini-implant anchorage for en-masse retraction of maxillary anterior teeth: a clinical cephalometric study
Abstract
Introduction: This study was conducted to determine the efficiency of mini-implants as intraoral anchorage units for en-masse retraction of the 6 maxillary anterior teeth when the first premolars are extracted compared with conventional methods of anchorage reinforcement.
Methods: Thirty patients requiring high anchorage after extraction of the maxillary first premolars were selected for this study. They were divided into 2 groups of 15 each. In the first group (G1), mini-implants were used for en-masse retraction; in the second group (G2), conventional methods of anchorage preservation were followed. Horizontal, vertical, and angular positions of the maxillary first molar and central incisor were evaluated cephalometrically before and after orthodontic retraction.
Results: The maxillary first molars in the G1 patients showed net distal movement of 0.55 mm, and mesial movement of 1.95 mm was found in G2. The differences were statistically significant. Distal tipping of the first molar of -0.13 degrees+/-3.63 degrees was seen in G1, and mesial tipping of 3.7 degrees+/-3.9 degrees was observed in G2. No significant differences were found in the rates of incisor retraction between the 2 groups. However, G1 showed more than 2 mm of incisor intrusion; this was statistically significant.
Conclusions: Mini-implants are efficient for intraoral anchorage reinforcement for en-masse retraction and intrusion of maxillary anterior teeth. No anchorage loss was seen in either the horizontal or the vertical direction in G1 when compared with G2. However, a statistically significant decrease in intermolar width was noted in G1.
Similar articles
-
Treatment effects of mini-implants for en-masse retraction of anterior teeth in bialveolar dental protrusion patients: a randomized controlled trial.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008 Jul;134(1):18-29.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.03.025. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008. PMID: 18617099 Clinical Trial.
-
Midpalatal miniscrews and high-pull headgear for anteroposterior and vertical anchorage control: cephalometric comparisons of treatment changes.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013 Aug;144(2):238-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.03.020. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013. PMID: 23910205
-
Comparison of treatment outcomes between skeletal anchorage and extraoral anchorage in adults with maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008 Nov;134(5):615-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.12.022. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008. PMID: 18984393 Clinical Trial.
-
Biomechanics of incisor retraction with mini-implant anchorage.J Orthod. 2014 Sep;41 Suppl 1:S15-23. doi: 10.1179/1465313314Y.0000000114. J Orthod. 2014. PMID: 25138361 Review.
-
En-masse Retraction of Upper Anterior Teeth in Adult Patients with Maxillary or Bimaxillary Dentoalveolar Protrusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.J Contemp Dent Pract. 2019 Jan 1;20(1):113-127. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2019. PMID: 31058623
Cited by
-
Distalization pattern of the maxillary arch depending on the number of orthodontic miniscrews.Angle Orthod. 2013 Mar;83(2):266-73. doi: 10.2319/032212-123.1. Epub 2012 Sep 12. Angle Orthod. 2013. PMID: 22970751 Free PMC article.
-
A clinical comparative study using anchorage from mini-implants and conventional anchorage methods to retract anterior teeth.J Family Med Prim Care. 2021 Jan;10(1):468-474. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_841_20. Epub 2021 Jan 30. J Family Med Prim Care. 2021. PMID: 34017772 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of the skeletal, dental, and soft-tissue changes after the en-masse retraction of upper anterior teeth stimulated by low-intensity electrical current: a randomized controlled clinical trial.BMC Oral Health. 2025 Jun 3;25(1):902. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06316-4. BMC Oral Health. 2025. PMID: 40462109 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
How Effective Are the Nance Appliance and Transpalatal Arch at Reinforcing Anchorage in Extraction Cases?Cureus. 2024 May 27;16(5):e61171. doi: 10.7759/cureus.61171. eCollection 2024 May. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 38933638 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Class I malocclusion with severe double protrusion treated with first premolars extraction.Dental Press J Orthod. 2014 May-Jun;19(3):127-38. doi: 10.1590/2176-9451.19.3.127-138.bbo. Dental Press J Orthod. 2014. PMID: 25162577 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials