Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 May;75(2):220-6.
doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.10.010. Epub 2008 Dec 4.

Patient initiation of information: exploring its role during the mental health intake visit

Ora Nakash  1 , Sarah Dargouth, Vanessa Oddo, Shan Gao, Margarita Alegría
Affiliations

Patient initiation of information: exploring its role during the mental health intake visit

Ora Nakash et al. Patient Educ Couns. 2009 May.

Abstract

Objective: Describe the role of patients' initiation of information in patient-provider communication during mental health intake visits.

Methods: One hundred and twenty-nine mental health intake visits of diverse racial/ethnic patients were videotaped. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with patients and providers following each intake visit. We qualitatively analyzed the interviews to identify themes related to patients' initiation of information. We quantitatively analyzed the videos of the intake visits utilizing a checklist that identified whether the patient or the provider initiated the information exchanged.

Results: Patient initiation of information affected providers' evaluation of the credence of the information, assessment of rapport and appraisal of the success of the intake visit. Patients' initiation of information varied with patients' race, age and prior treatment experience; and provider's age, discipline and experience. Patients expressed a personal preference either to not be interrupted or to be asked questions by their providers.

Conclusion: Our findings illuminate the role of patient initiation of information in provider decision-making and highlight the importance of tailoring the communication style to patients' preferences.

Practice implications: Encouraging explicit communication with patients about expectations related to information exchange styles is recommended. Improving provider awareness of assumptions regarding their decision-making is also suggested.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Kazdin A. Research design in clinical psychology. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon; 1998.
    1. Shea S. Handbook of Psychological Assessment. Kidlington, UK: Elsevier Science Ltd; 2000. Contemporary Clinical Interviewing: Mental Status and Research.
    1. Turner S, Hersen M, Heiser N. Diagnostic Interviewing. New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers; 2003. The Interviewing Process.
    1. Aklin W, Turner S. Toward Understanding Ethnic and Cultural Factors in the Interviewing Process. Psychother: Theory, Res, Pract, Train. 2006;43:50–64. - PubMed
    1. Wood J, Garb H, Lilienfeld S, Nezwoeski M. Clinical Assessment. Annu Rev Psychol. 2002;53:519–43. - PubMed

Publication types