Evaluation of patient dose for barium enemas and CT colonography in Japan
- PMID: 19064598
- DOI: 10.1259/bjr/18915538
Evaluation of patient dose for barium enemas and CT colonography in Japan
Abstract
The objective of this study was to assess patient doses for examinations of the lower digestive tract (barium enemas and CT colonography) in Japan. These doses were evaluated from in-phantom dose measurements using a dosemeter-implanted anthropomorphic phantom and from the knowledge of procedures of these examinations. For barium enemas, the doses, which were the sums of doses for various projections in the procedure, were separately derived for fluoroscopy and for analogue and digital radiography. For CT colonography, the doses were evaluated for the prone and the supine positions, each including the doses by scout imaging, and a single abdominal scan for routine and low-dose set-ups. For barium enemas, maximum local skin doses were less than 100 mGy despite relatively long average fluoroscopy times of 8 min; organ doses ranged from 9-26 mGy in the abdomen. The effective dose of 10.7 mSv for analogue radiography decreased by 12% when digital radiography was used, although more than 80% of the dose was due to fluoroscopy. In routine CT colonography performed using a relatively high mean effective mAs of 119 for the accurate detection of colorectal cancer and extra colonic lesions, organ doses within the primary X-ray beam were between 30 mGy and 44 mGy for paired scans whereas, in a low-dose set-up with an effective mAs of 27, they were approximately 10 mGy. Effective doses for routine and low-dose CT colonography of 23.4 mSv and 5.7 mSv were about double and half of the doses for barium enemas, respectively.
Similar articles
-
CT colonography versus double-contrast barium enema for screening of colorectal cancer: comparison of radiation burden.Abdom Imaging. 2010 Oct;35(5):596-601. doi: 10.1007/s00261-009-9568-x. Epub 2009 Sep 24. Abdom Imaging. 2010. PMID: 19777290
-
History, evolution, and current status of radiologic imaging tests for colorectal cancer screening.Radiology. 2014 Nov;273(2 Suppl):S160-80. doi: 10.1148/radiol.14140531. Radiology. 2014. PMID: 25340435 Review.
-
Comparison of radiologists' confidence in excluding significant colorectal neoplasia with multidetector-row CT colonography compared with double contrast barium enema.Br J Radiol. 2006 Mar;79(939):208-15. doi: 10.1259/bjr/99126323. Br J Radiol. 2006. PMID: 16498032
-
Comparison of the relative sensitivity of CT colonography and double-contrast barium enema for screen detection of colorectal polyps.Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004 Apr;2(4):314-21. doi: 10.1016/s1542-3565(04)00061-8. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004. PMID: 15067626
-
[Virtual colonography].Med Klin (Munich). 2003 Dec 15;98(12):700-11. doi: 10.1007/s00063-003-1316-3. Med Klin (Munich). 2003. PMID: 14685671 Review. German.
Cited by
-
Evaluation of radiation exposure dose at double-balloon endoscopy for the patients with small bowel disease.Nagoya J Med Sci. 2016 Aug;78(3):245-53. Nagoya J Med Sci. 2016. PMID: 27578908 Free PMC article.
-
Colonic polyps: inheritance, susceptibility, risk evaluation, and diagnostic management.Cancer Manag Res. 2010 Dec 30;3:17-24. doi: 10.2147/CMR.S15705. Cancer Manag Res. 2010. PMID: 21407996 Free PMC article.
-
Cancer risk related to gastrointestinal diagnostic radiation exposure.Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2011 Oct;13(5):449-57. doi: 10.1007/s11894-011-0214-8. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2011. PMID: 21833692 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical