Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Dec 17;100(24):1755-62.
doi: 10.1093/jnci/djn383. Epub 2008 Dec 9.

Estimates and projections of value of life lost from cancer deaths in the United States

Affiliations

Estimates and projections of value of life lost from cancer deaths in the United States

K Robin Yabroff et al. J Natl Cancer Inst. .

Abstract

Background: Value-of-life methods are increasingly used in policy analyses of the economic burden of disease. The purpose of this study was to estimate and project the value of life lost from cancer deaths in the United States.

Methods: We estimated and projected US age-specific mortality rates for all cancers and for 16 types of cancer in men and 18 cancers in women in the years 2000-2020 and applied them to US population projections to estimate the number of deaths in each year. Cohort life tables were used to calculate the remaining life expectancy in the absence of cancer deaths-the person-years of life lost (PYLL). We used a willingness-to-pay approach in which the value of life lost due to cancer death was calculated by multiplying PYLL by an estimate of the value of 1 year of life ($150,000). We performed sensitivity analyses for female breast, colorectal, lung, and prostate cancers using varying assumptions about future cancer mortality rates through the year 2020.

Results: The value of life lost from all cancer deaths in the year 2000 was $960.6 billion; lung cancer alone represented more than 25% of this value. Projections for the year 2020 with current cancer mortality rates showed a 53% increase in the total value of life lost ($1472.5 billion). Projected annual decreases of cancer mortality rates of 2% reduced the expected value of life lost in the year 2020 from $121.0 billion to $80.7 billion for breast cancer, $140.1 billion to $93.5 billion for colorectal cancer, from $433.4 billion to $289.4 billion for lung cancer, and from $58.4 billion to $39.0 billion for prostate cancer.

Conclusions: Estimated value of life lost due to cancer deaths in the United States is substantial and expected to increase dramatically, even if mortality rates remain constant, because of expected population changes. These estimates and projections may help target investments in cancer control strategies to tumor sites that are likely to result in the greatest burden of disease and to interventions that are the most cost-effective.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Projected value of life lost due to lung cancer deaths in the United States. The most recent years of data (ie, from 1999 to 2003) were used to calculate sex- and age-specific lung cancer mortality rates for the base case mortality rate projections. Sensitivity analysis scenarios included annual 1%, 2%, and 4% declines in lung cancer mortality.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Projected value of life lost due to colorectal cancer deaths in the United States. The most recent years of data (ie, from 1999 to 2003) were used to calculate sex- and age-specific colorectal cancer mortality rates for the base case mortality rate projections. Sensitivity analysis scenarios included annual 1%, 2%, and 4% declines in colorectal cancer mortality.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Projected value of life lost due to breast cancer deaths in the United States. The most recent years of data (ie, from 1999 to 2003) were used to calculate sex- and age-specific breast cancer mortality rates for the base case mortality rate projections. Sensitivity analysis scenarios included annual 1%, 2%, and 4% declines in breast cancer mortality.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Projected value of life lost due to prostate cancer deaths in the United States. The most recent years of data (ie, from 1999 to 2003) were used to calculate sex- and age-specific prostate cancer mortality rates for the base case mortality rate projections. Sensitivity analysis scenarios included annual 1%, 2%, and 4% declines in prostate cancer mortality.

Comment in

  • How should we value lives lost to cancer?
    Ramsey SD. Ramsey SD. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008 Dec 17;100(24):1742-3. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djn434. Epub 2008 Dec 9. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008. PMID: 19066279 No abstract available.

References

    1. Brown ML, Lipscomb J, Snyder C. The burden of illness in cancer: economic cost and quality of life. Ann Rev Public Health. 2001;22:91–113. - PubMed
    1. Brown ML, Yabroff KR. Economic impact of cancer in the United States. In: Schottenfeld David, Joseph F Faumeni J., editors. Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2006. pp. 202–214.
    1. Nordhaus WD. The health of nations: the contribution of improved health to living standards. In: Murphy K, Topel R, editors. Measuring the Gains From Medical Research: An Economic Approach. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 2003. pp. 9–40.
    1. Brown ML, Hodgson TA, Rice DP. Economic impact of cancer in United States. In: Schottenfeld D, Faumeni JF Jr, editors. Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1996. pp. 255–266.
    1. Rice DP, Hodgson TA. Social and Economic Implications of Cancer in the United States. DHHS Publication No. PHS81-1404. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 1981. Vital and Health Statistics, Series 3, No. 20.

MeSH terms