Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Mar;122(2):193-200.
doi: 10.1007/s10265-008-0203-7. Epub 2008 Dec 10.

Effect of needle damage on the release rate of Masson pine (Pinus massoniana) volatiles

Affiliations

Effect of needle damage on the release rate of Masson pine (Pinus massoniana) volatiles

Jian-Wei Su et al. J Plant Res. 2009 Mar.

Abstract

The effect of needle damage on the release rate of Masson pine (Pinus massoniana Lamb.) volatiles was examined. Needles were continuously damaged by mechanical damage (MDP) or by feeding of pine caterpillar (Dendrolimus punctatus) larvae (LFP); undamaged pine was used as a control (UDP). Volatiles were collected before damage, and at 16, 24, 40, 48, 64, 72, 88 and 96 h post-damage, and analyzed. The analyses revealed that 19 compounds identified as constitutive volatiles from UDP were terpenes and green leaf odors. The release rate of volatiles from MDP or LFP was higher than that from UDP. At 96 h post-damage, emission from MDP or LFP returned to the same level as that of UDP. Some volatiles, including sabinene, ocimene, limonene-1,2-epoxide, linalool, linalool acetate, germacrene D: -4-ol, farnesol, and (E)-4,8-dimethyl-1,3,7-nonatriene were induced by mechanical damage and/or larval attack. Furthermore, the release rate of linalool acetate, farnesol, or (E)-4,8-dimethyl-1,3,7-nonatriene from LFP was higher than that from MDP. Based on an exact estimation of the proportion of damaged pine needles, a significant linear correlation between the release rate of total volatiles identified and the proportion of damaged needles was found in the case of LFP but not MDP.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. J Chem Ecol. 1995 Aug;21(8):1217-27 - PubMed
    1. Oecologia. 1998 May;114(4):531-540 - PubMed
    1. Plant Physiol. 2005 Mar;137(3):1160-8 - PubMed
    1. Plant Physiol. 1991 May;96(1):44-9 - PubMed
    1. J Chem Ecol. 1990 Nov;16(11):3091-118 - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources