Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Feb;24(2):203-9.
doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2008.11.002. Epub 2008 Dec 12.

Relative stability of conventional and locked plating fixation in a model of the osteoporotic femoral diaphysis

Affiliations

Relative stability of conventional and locked plating fixation in a model of the osteoporotic femoral diaphysis

Daniel C Fitzpatrick et al. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2009 Feb.

Abstract

Background: This study investigated the stiffness and strength of bridge plating with uni-cortical and bi-cortical locking plate constructs relative to a conventional, non-locked construct in the osteoporotic femoral diaphysis.

Methods: Four bridge plating configurations were applied to a validated model of the osteoporotic femoral diaphysis. A non-locked conventional configuration served as baseline. Locked configurations included bi-cortical locked plating, uni-cortical locked plating and mix-mode locked plating, which combined uni and bi-cortical locking screws. For all configurations, an 11-hole plate was applied with 4.5-mm screws placed in the 1st, 3rd, and 5th plate hole. Five specimens of each configuration were dynamically loaded until failure in torsion, axial compression, and bending to determine construct stiffness, strength and failure modes.

Findings: In torsion and bending, locked plating constructs provided a significantly lower stiffness and strength than the conventional construct. The uni-cortical locked construct was 69% weaker (P<0.001) in torsion than the conventional construct, but its torsional strength improved 73% (P<0.001) by adding one bi-cortical locked screw. In axial compression, construct stiffness varied by less than 10% between the four groups. However, the bi-cortical and mixed-mode locked constructs provided a significant increase in strength of 12% (P=0.001) and 11% (P=0.002), respectively, compared to the conventional construct.

Interpretations: Locked plating in the osteoporotic diaphysis can improve fixation strength under axial loading, but may reduce fixation strength in bending and torsion compared to conventional plating. Adding one bi-cortical locked screw to an otherwise uni-cortical construct is recommended to improve torsional strength.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Bridge plating constructs, representing four diaphyseal fixation configurations: conventional non-locked plating (CP), bi-cortical locked plating (BLP), uni-cortical locked plating (ULP), and mixed-mode (uni- and bi-cortical) locked plating (MLP). Construct failure was isolated to the osteoporotic diaphyseal side of each construct.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Construct testing under three distinct loading conditions: four-point bending in gap-closing direction; torsions; and axial compression. Interfragmentary motion in response to progressive dynamic loading was recorded by motion sensors (S).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Construct stiffnesses in torsion, axial compression and four-point-bending. Asterisks (*) denote significant differences between groups.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Construct failure loads in torsion, axial compression, and four-point-bending. Asterisks (*) denote significant differences between groups.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Failure modes of constructs: a) in torsion, failures included spiral fracture at the plate end (CP) and screw breakage between the elevated plate and the bone; b) in axial compression, all constructs failed by screw migration, resulting in elongation of the near cortex screw holes; c) in bending, all constructs failed by transverse fracture through the screw hole at the plate end.

References

    1. Allgower M, Spiegel PG. Internal fixation of fractures: evolution of concepts. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1979:26–9. - PubMed
    1. Astm. Standard Specification and Test Methods for Metallic Medical Bone Screws. ASTM International. 2002:F543–02.
    1. Beaupre GS, Giori NJ, Caler WE, Csongradi J. A comparison of uni-cortical and bi-cortical end screw attachment of fracture fixation plates. J Orthop Trauma. 1992;6:294–300. - PubMed
    1. Bong MR, Egol KA, Koval KJ, Kummer FJ, Su ET, Iesaka K, Bayer J, Di Cesare PE. Comparison of the LISS and a retrograde-inserted supracondylar intramedullary nail for fixation of a periprosthetic distal femur fracture proximal to a total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2002;17:876–81. - PubMed
    1. Button G, Wolinsky P, Hak D. Failure of less invasive stabilization system plates in the distal femur: a report of four cases. J Orthop Trauma. 2004;18:565–70. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms