Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2009 Jan 15;81(2):764-71.
doi: 10.1021/ac801905g.

Quantitative proteomics: measuring protein synthesis using 15N amino acid labeling in pancreatic cancer cells

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Quantitative proteomics: measuring protein synthesis using 15N amino acid labeling in pancreatic cancer cells

Yingchun Zhao et al. Anal Chem. .

Abstract

Pancreatic cancer MIA PaCa cells were cultured in the presence and absence of (15)N amino acids mixture for 72 h. During protein synthesis, the incorporation of (15)N amino acids results in a new mass isotopomer distribution in protein, which is approximated by the concatenation of two binomial distributions of (13)C and (15)N. The fraction of protein synthesis (FSR) can thus be determined from the relative intensities of the "labeled" (new) and the "unlabeled" (old) spectra. Six prominent spots were picked from 2-D gels of proteins from lysates of cells cultured in 0% (control), 50%, and 33% (15)N enriched media. These protein spots were digested and analyzed with matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight/time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF/TOF) mass spectrometry. The isotopomer distribution of peptides after labeling can be fully accounted for by the labeled (new) and unlabeled (old) peptides. The ratio of the new and old peptide fractions was determined using multiple regression analysis of the observed spectrum as a linear combination of the expected new and the old spectra. The fractional protein synthesis rates calculated from such ratios of the same peptide from cells grown in 50% and 33% (15)N amino acid enrichments were comparable to each other. The FSR of these six identified proteins ranged between 44 and 76%.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Gel image after 2-D electrophoresis. MIA PaCa cells were cultured in MEM medium enriched with natural amino acids (A), 50% 15N labeled algal amino acids (B), and 33% 15N labeled algal amino acids (C) for 3 days. The cell pellets were lysed in 2-D lysis buffer and applied to 2-D electrophoresis. The marked spots were selected, cut out, digested, and analyzed. See Material and Methods for details.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mass spectra of 1699 m/z fragment from spot 6 of lysates of cells grown in the presence of natural amino acids (Panel A), 50% enriched (Panel B) and 33% enriched (Panel C) 15N algal amino acid mixtures. MS spectrum of control in Panel A shows the binomial distribution of isotopomic peaks largely due to natural existence of 13C. Incorporation of 15N resulted in obvious mass shift in isotopomic distribution in Panel B and C. The degree of mass shift is a function of 15N enrichment. Panel D shows MS/MS spectrum of this fragment in ‘lift” mode. The peptide sequence is easily identified as almost every y ion is observed.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Illustration of data analysis using example of 1699 m/z fragment from spot 6. Panel A: Theoretical and experimental distribution of the unlabeled fragment is compared. M0 is the monoisotopic peak. Panel B: Mass spectra of unlabeled and labeled peptides are aligned showing mass shifts, which was determined by curve fitting. Mass shift is larger with higher 15N enrichment. Panel C: Spectrum of peptide from MIA cells grown in 50% 15N enriched medium is shown with spectra of existing and newly synthesized peptide obtained by concatenation process. Panel D: Spectrum of peptide from MIA cells grown in 33% 15N enriched medium is shown with spectra of existing and newly synthesized peptide obtained by concatenation process. Fractional synthesis rate can be calculated using multiple linear regression analysis.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Synthesis rate comparison among the six identified proteins after 72 hours. 1, Calreticulin precursor; 2, Alpha-enolase; 3, Triosephosphate isomerase; 4, Phosphoglycerate mutase I; 5, Prohibitin; 6, 40S ribosomal protein SA. Open columns represent 50% 15N labeling and filled columns represent 33% 15N labeling. The turnover rates of protein 1 and 5 are significantly lower than those of protein 2, 3, 4, and 6.

References

    1. Doherty MK, Whitehead C, McCormack H, Gaskell SJ, Beynon RJ. Proteomics. 2005;5:522–33. - PubMed
    1. Pratt JM, Petty J, Riba-Garcia I, Robertson DH, Gaskell SJ, Oliver SG, Beynon RJ. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2002;1:579–91. - PubMed
    1. Gygi SP, Rist B, Gerber SA, Turecek F, Gelb MH, Aebersold R. Nat Biotechnol. 1999;17:994–99. - PubMed
    1. Gan CS, Chong PK, Pham TK, Wright PC. J Proteome Res. 2007;6:821–27. - PubMed
    1. Busch R, Kim YK, Neese RA, Schade-Serin V, Collins M, Awada M, Gardner JL, Beysen C, Marino ME, Misell LM, Hellerstein MK. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2006;1760:730–44. - PubMed

Publication types