Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2008;14(4):268-75.
doi: 10.1002/ddrr.37.

Inhibitory functioning across ADHD subtypes: recent findings, clinical implications, and future directions

Affiliations
Review

Inhibitory functioning across ADHD subtypes: recent findings, clinical implications, and future directions

Zachary W Adams et al. Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2008.

Abstract

Although growing consensus supports the role of deficient behavioral inhibition as a central feature of the combined subtype of ADHD (ADHD/C; Barkley 1997 Psychol Bull 121:65-94; Nigg 2001 Psychol Bull 127:571-598), little research has focused on how this finding generalizes to the primarily inattentive subtype (ADHD/I). This question holds particular relevance in light of recent work suggesting that ADHD/I might be better characterized as a disorder separate from ADHD/C (Diamond 2005 Dev Psychopathol 17:807-825; Milich et al. 2001 Clin Psychol Sci Pract 8:463-488). This article describes major findings in the area of inhibitory performance in ADHD and highlights recent research suggesting important areas of divergence between the subtypes. In particular, preliminary findings point to potential differences between the subtypes with respect to how children process important contextual information from the environment, such as preparatory cues that precede responses and rewarding or punishing feedback following behavior. These suggestive findings are discussed in the context of treatment implications, which could involve differential intervention approaches for each subtype targeted to the specific deficit profiles that characterize each group of children. Future research avenues aimed toward building a sound theoretical model of ADHD/I and a better understanding of its relation to ADHD/C are also presented. Specifically, investigators are encouraged to continue studying the complex interplay between inhibitory and attentional processes, as this area seems particularly promising in its ability to improve our understanding of the potentially distinct pathologies underlying the ADHD subtypes.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Adams ZW, Milich R, Fillmore MT, Lorch EP. Evaluating visual and manual inhibitory processes among ADHD subtypes. 2008.
    1. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 4. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 1994.
    1. Baeyens D, Roeyers H, Vande Walle J. Subtypes of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): distinct or related disorders across measurement levels? Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2006;36:403–417. - PubMed
    1. Barkley RA. Behavioral inhibition, sustained attention, and executive functions: constructing a unifying theory of ADHD. Psychol Bull. 1997;121:65–94. - PubMed
    1. Barkley RA. The inattentive type of ADHD as a distinct disorder: what remains to be done. Clin Psychol Sci Pract. 2001;8:489–493.

Publication types