Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2009 Jun;9(6):447-53.
doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2008.11.009. Epub 2008 Dec 13.

The reliability of determining "leg dominant pain"

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

The reliability of determining "leg dominant pain"

Eugene K Wai et al. Spine J. 2009 Jun.

Abstract

Background context: Patients with back dominant pain generally have a worse prognosis after spine surgery when compared with patients with leg dominant pain. Despite the importance of determining whether patients with lumbar spine pain have back or leg dominant pain as a predictor for success after decompression surgery, there are limited data on the reliability of methods for doing so.

Purpose: To assess the test-retest reliability of a patient's ability to describe whether their lumbar spine pain is leg or back dominant using standardized questions.

Study design/setting: Prospective, blinded, test-retest cohort study performed in an academic spinal surgery clinic.

Patient sample: Consecutive patients presenting for consultation to one of three spinal surgeons for lumbar spine pain were enrolled.

Outcome measures: Eight questions to ascertain a patient's dominant location of pain, either back dominant or leg dominant, were identified from the literature and local experts.

Methods: These eight questions were administered in a test-retest format over two weeks. The test-retest reliability of these questions were assessed in a self-administered questionnaire format for one group of patients and by a trained interviewer in a second group.

Results: The test-retest reliability of each question ranged from substantial (eg, interviewer-administered percent question, weighted kappa=0.77) to slight (eg, self-administered pain diagram, weighted kappa=0.09). The Percent question was the most reliable in both groups (self-administered, interviewer). All questions in the interviewer-administered group were significantly (p<.001) more reliable than the self-administered group. Depending on the question, between 0% and 32% of patients provided a completely opposite response on test-retest. There was variability in prevalence of leg dominant pain, depending on which question was asked and there was no single question that identified all patients with leg dominant pain.

Conclusion: A patient's ability to identify whether his or her lumbar spine pain is leg or back dominant may be unreliable and depends on which questions are asked, and also how they are asked. The Percent question is the most reliable method to determine the dominant location of pain. However, given the variability of responses and the generally poorer reliability of many specific questions, it is recommended that multiple methods be used to assess a patient's dominant location of pain.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources