The reliability of determining "leg dominant pain"
- PMID: 19073373
- DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2008.11.009
The reliability of determining "leg dominant pain"
Abstract
Background context: Patients with back dominant pain generally have a worse prognosis after spine surgery when compared with patients with leg dominant pain. Despite the importance of determining whether patients with lumbar spine pain have back or leg dominant pain as a predictor for success after decompression surgery, there are limited data on the reliability of methods for doing so.
Purpose: To assess the test-retest reliability of a patient's ability to describe whether their lumbar spine pain is leg or back dominant using standardized questions.
Study design/setting: Prospective, blinded, test-retest cohort study performed in an academic spinal surgery clinic.
Patient sample: Consecutive patients presenting for consultation to one of three spinal surgeons for lumbar spine pain were enrolled.
Outcome measures: Eight questions to ascertain a patient's dominant location of pain, either back dominant or leg dominant, were identified from the literature and local experts.
Methods: These eight questions were administered in a test-retest format over two weeks. The test-retest reliability of these questions were assessed in a self-administered questionnaire format for one group of patients and by a trained interviewer in a second group.
Results: The test-retest reliability of each question ranged from substantial (eg, interviewer-administered percent question, weighted kappa=0.77) to slight (eg, self-administered pain diagram, weighted kappa=0.09). The Percent question was the most reliable in both groups (self-administered, interviewer). All questions in the interviewer-administered group were significantly (p<.001) more reliable than the self-administered group. Depending on the question, between 0% and 32% of patients provided a completely opposite response on test-retest. There was variability in prevalence of leg dominant pain, depending on which question was asked and there was no single question that identified all patients with leg dominant pain.
Conclusion: A patient's ability to identify whether his or her lumbar spine pain is leg or back dominant may be unreliable and depends on which questions are asked, and also how they are asked. The Percent question is the most reliable method to determine the dominant location of pain. However, given the variability of responses and the generally poorer reliability of many specific questions, it is recommended that multiple methods be used to assess a patient's dominant location of pain.
Similar articles
-
Importance of the back-café concept to rehabilitation after lumbar spinal fusion: a randomized clinical study with a 2-year follow-up.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Dec 1;28(23):2561-9. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000097890.96524.A1. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003. PMID: 14652472 Clinical Trial.
-
Measuring self-reported functional status and pain in patients with chronic low back pain by postal questionnaires: a reliability study.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Apr 15;28(8):828-33. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003. PMID: 12698128
-
Interobserver reliability in the interpretation of diagnostic lumbar MRI and nuclear imaging.Spine J. 2006 Mar-Apr;6(2):177-84. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2005.08.011. Epub 2006 Jan 27. Spine J. 2006. PMID: 16517390
-
Recurrent disc herniation and long-term back pain after primary lumbar discectomy: review of outcomes reported for limited versus aggressive disc removal.Neurosurgery. 2009 Feb;64(2):338-44; discussion 344-5. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000337574.58662.E2. Neurosurgery. 2009. PMID: 19190461 Review.
-
[Interrater studies of evaluating the reliability of somatic findings].Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 1996 Aug;35(3):150-60. Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 1996. PMID: 8975344 Review. German.
Cited by
-
Validity of a single-item measure to assess leg or back pain as the predominant symptom in patients with degenerative disorders of the lumbar spine.Eur Spine J. 2014 Apr;23(4):882-7. doi: 10.1007/s00586-014-3193-2. Epub 2014 Jan 30. Eur Spine J. 2014. PMID: 24477378 Free PMC article.
-
Do Patients with Back Pain-Dominant Symptoms Improve After Lumbar Surgery for Radiculopathy or Claudication?Int J Spine Surg. 2021 Aug;15(4):780-787. doi: 10.14444/8100. Epub 2021 Jul 15. Int J Spine Surg. 2021. PMID: 34266928 Free PMC article.
-
Back Dominant Pain Has Equal Outcomes to Radicular Dominant Pain Following Posterior Lumbar Fusion in Adult Isthmic Spondylolisthesis: A CSORN Study.Global Spine J. 2022 Oct;12(8):1667-1675. doi: 10.1177/2192568220985471. Epub 2021 Jan 7. Global Spine J. 2022. PMID: 33406898 Free PMC article.
-
Do preoperative clinical and radiographic characteristics impact patient outcomes following one-level minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion based upon presenting symptoms?Spine J. 2022 Apr;22(4):570-577. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.10.013. Epub 2021 Oct 23. Spine J. 2022. PMID: 34699995 Free PMC article.
-
Potential triaging of referrals for lumbar spinal surgery consultation: a comparison of referral accuracy from pain specialists, findings from advanced imaging and a 3-item questionnaire.Can J Surg. 2009 Dec;52(6):473-80. Can J Surg. 2009. PMID: 20011183 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources