Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Mar 27;364(1518):719-42.
doi: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0276.

Group decisions in humans and animals: a survey

Affiliations

Group decisions in humans and animals: a survey

Larissa Conradt et al. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. .

Abstract

Humans routinely make many decisions collectively, whether they choose a restaurant with friends, elect political leaders or decide actions to tackle international problems, such as climate change, that affect the future of the whole planet. We might be less aware of it, but group decisions are just as important to social animals as they are for us. Animal groups have to collectively decide about communal movements, activities, nesting sites and enterprises, such as cooperative breeding or hunting, that crucially affect their survival and reproduction. While human group decisions have been studied for millennia, the study of animal group decisions is relatively young, but is now expanding rapidly. It emerges that group decisions in animals pose many similar questions to those in humans. The purpose of the present issue is to integrate and combine approaches in the social and natural sciences in an area in which theoretical challenges and research questions are often similar, and to introduce each discipline to the other's key ideas, findings and successful methods. In order to make such an introduction as effective as possible, here, we briefly review conceptual similarities and differences between the sciences, and provide a guide to the present issue.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Alexander, J. M. 2003 Evolutionary game theory. Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy See http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/game-evolutionary/
    1. Amé J.-M., Halloy J., Rivault C., Detrain C., Deneubourg J.L. Collegial decision making based on social amplification leads to optimal group formation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2006;103:5835–5840. doi:10.1073/pnas.0507877103 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Arrow A.K. Wiley; New York, NY: 1951/1963. Social choice and individual values.
    1. Aube F., Shield R. Modeling the effect of leadership on crowd flow dynamics. Cell. Automat. Proc. 2004;3305:601–611.
    1. Austen-Smith D., Banks J.S. University of Michigan Press; Ann Arbor, MI: 1999. Positive political theory I: collective preference.

Publication types