Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Dec 15;10(5):e50.
doi: 10.2196/jmir.1001.

Online advertising as a public health and recruitment tool: comparison of different media campaigns to increase demand for smoking cessation interventions

Amanda L Graham  1 , Pat Milner, Jessie E Saul, Lillian Pfaff
Affiliations

Online advertising as a public health and recruitment tool: comparison of different media campaigns to increase demand for smoking cessation interventions

Amanda L Graham et al. J Med Internet Res. .

Erratum in

  • J Med Internet Res. 2009;11(1):e2

Abstract

Background: To improve the overall impact (reach x efficacy) of cessation treatments and to reduce the population prevalence of smoking, innovative strategies are needed that increase consumer demand for and use of cessation treatments. Given that 12 million people search for smoking cessation information each year, online advertising may represent a cost-efficient approach to reach and recruit online smokers to treatment. Online ads can be implemented in many forms, and surveys consistently show that consumers are receptive. Few studies have examined the potential of online advertising to recruit smokers to cessation treatments.

Objective: The aims of the study were to (1) demonstrate the feasibility of online advertising as a strategy to increase consumer demand for cessation treatments, (2) illustrate the tools that can be used to track and evaluate the impact of online advertising on treatment utilization, and (3) highlight some of the methodological challenges and future directions for researchers.

Methods: An observational design was used to examine the impact of online advertising compared to traditional recruitment approaches (billboards, television and radio ads, outdoor advertising, direct mail, and physician detailing) on several dependent variables: (1) number of individuals who enrolled in Web- or telephone-based cessation treatment, (2) the demographic, smoking, and treatment utilization characteristics of smokers recruited to treatment, and (3) the cost to enroll smokers. Several creative approaches to online ads (banner ads, paid search) were tested on national and local websites and search engines. The comparison group was comprised of individuals who registered for Web-based cessation treatment in response to traditional advertising during the same time period.

Results: A total of 130,214 individuals responded to advertising during the study period: 23,923 (18.4%) responded to traditional recruitment approaches and 106,291 (81.6%) to online ads. Of those who clicked on an online ad, 9655 (9.1%) registered for cessation treatment: 6.8% (n = 7268) for Web only, 1.1% (n = 1119) for phone only, and 1.2% (n = 1268) for Web and phone. Compared to traditional recruitment approaches, online ads recruited a higher percentage of males, young adults, racial/ethnic minorities, those with a high school education or less, and dependent smokers. Cost-effectiveness analyses compare favorably to traditional recruitment strategies, with costs as low as US $5-$8 per enrolled smoker.

Conclusions: Developing and evaluating new ways to increase consumer demand for evidence-based cessation services is critical to cost-efficiently reduce population smoking prevalence. Results suggest that online advertising is a promising approach to recruit smokers to Web- and telephone-based cessation interventions. The enrollment rate of 9.1% exceeds most studies of traditional recruitment approaches. The powerful targeting capabilities of online advertising present new opportunities to reach subgroups of smokers who may not respond to other forms of advertising. Online advertising also provides unique evaluation opportunities and challenges to determine rigorously its impact and value.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Response rates for online and offline ads
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Cigarette smoking among adults--United States, 1998. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2000 Oct 6;49(39):881–4. http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm4939a1.htm - PubMed
    1. Cohen S, Lichtenstein E, Prochaska J O, Rossi J S, Gritz E R, Carr C R, Orleans C T, Schoenbach V J, Biener L, Abrams D. Debunking myths about self-quitting. Evidence from 10 prospective studies of persons who attempt to quit smoking by themselves. Am Psychol. 1989 Nov;44(11):1355–65. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.44.11.1355. - DOI - PubMed
    1. A clinical practice guideline for treating tobacco use and dependence: A US Public Health Service report. The Tobacco Use and Dependence Clinical Practice Guideline Panel, Staff, and Consortium Representatives. JAMA. 2000 Jun 28;283(24):3244–54. doi: 10.1001/jama.283.24.3244. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cokkinides Vilma E, Ward Elizabeth, Jemal Ahmedin, Thun Michael J. Under-use of smoking-cessation treatments: results from the National Health Interview Survey, 2000. Am J Prev Med. 2005 Jan;28(1):119–22. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2004.09.007. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zhu S, Melcer T, Sun J, Rosbrook B, Pierce J P. Smoking cessation with and without assistance: a population-based analysis. Am J Prev Med. 2000 May;18(4):305–11. doi: 10.1016/S0749-3797(00)00124-0. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types