Comparison of a commercial real-time PCR assay for tcdB detection to a cell culture cytotoxicity assay and toxigenic culture for direct detection of toxin-producing Clostridium difficile in clinical samples
- PMID: 19073875
- PMCID: PMC2643696
- DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01613-08
Comparison of a commercial real-time PCR assay for tcdB detection to a cell culture cytotoxicity assay and toxigenic culture for direct detection of toxin-producing Clostridium difficile in clinical samples
Abstract
Rapid detection of toxin-producing strains of Clostridium difficile is essential for optimal management of patients with C. difficile infection. The BD GeneOhm (San Diego, CA) Cdiff assay, a real-time PCR assay that amplifies tcdB, was compared to a cell culture neutralization assay (Wampole C. difficile Toxin B [TOX-B] test; TechLab, Blacksburg, VA) and to toxigenic culture. Using liquid (n = 273) and soft (n = 131) stool specimens from 377 symptomatic patients, all testing was performed on the same day by independent laboratory staff according to the manufacturers' protocols. Toxigenic bacterial culture was performed as follows. A 0.5-ml aliquot of stool was heated to 80 degrees C for 10 min, followed by inoculation onto modified cycloserine cefoxitin fructose agar with and without horse blood (Remel, Lenexa, KS) and into prereduced chopped-meat broth. Of the 404 stool specimens tested, 340 were negative and 40 were positive (10.0% prevalence) both by PCR for tcdB and by cytotoxin production. The overall agreement between the BD GeneOhm Cdiff assay and the TOX-B test was 94.8% (380/401). When the TOX-B test was used as the reference method, the initial sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the BD GeneOhm Cdiff assay were 90.9% (40/44), 95.2% (340/357), 70.2% (40/57), and 98.8% (340/344), respectively. When toxigenic culture was used as the "gold standard," the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the BD GeneOhm Cdiff assay were 83.6%, 98.2%, 89.5%, and 97.1%, respectively, and those of the TOX-B test were 67.2%, 99.1%, 93.2%, and 94.4%, respectively. PCRs for three samples were inhibited upon initial testing; one sample was resolved upon retesting. One sample produced nonspecific cytotoxin results. The BD GeneOhm Cdiff assay performed well compared to a standard cell culture neutralization assay and to toxigenic culture for the detection of toxigenic C. difficile directly from fecal specimens.
Similar articles
-
Evaluation of a new commercial TaqMan PCR assay for direct detection of the clostridium difficile toxin B gene in clinical stool specimens.J Clin Microbiol. 2009 Dec;47(12):3846-50. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01490-09. Epub 2009 Oct 21. J Clin Microbiol. 2009. PMID: 19846637 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of BD GeneOhm Cdiff real-time PCR assay with a two-step algorithm and a toxin A/B enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for diagnosis of toxigenic Clostridium difficile infection.J Clin Microbiol. 2010 Jan;48(1):109-14. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01630-09. Epub 2009 Oct 28. J Clin Microbiol. 2010. PMID: 19864479 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of a rapid molecular method, the BD GeneOhm Cdiff assay, to the most frequently used laboratory tests for detection of toxin-producing Clostridium difficile in diarrheal feces.J Clin Microbiol. 2009 Nov;47(11):3478-81. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01133-09. Epub 2009 Sep 30. J Clin Microbiol. 2009. PMID: 19794052 Free PMC article.
-
Diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection: comparison of four methods on specimens collected in Cary-Blair transport medium and tcdB PCR on fresh versus frozen samples.Infect Dis Rep. 2011 May 5;3(1):e5. doi: 10.4081/idr.2011.e5. eCollection 2011 Mar 8. Infect Dis Rep. 2011. PMID: 24470904 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Does this patient have Clostridioides difficile infection? A systematic review and meta-analysis.Clin Microbiol Infect. 2023 Nov;29(11):1367-1374. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2023.06.010. Epub 2023 Jun 14. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2023. PMID: 37327874
Cited by
-
Diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection: an ongoing conundrum for clinicians and for clinical laboratories.Clin Microbiol Rev. 2013 Jul;26(3):604-30. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00016-13. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2013. PMID: 23824374 Free PMC article. Review.
-
An unusual cause of false-positive results with the BD GeneOhm Cdiff assay.J Clin Microbiol. 2013 Apr;51(4):1348-9. doi: 10.1128/JCM.03341-12. Epub 2013 Jan 23. J Clin Microbiol. 2013. PMID: 23345300 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Is repeat PCR needed for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection?J Clin Microbiol. 2010 Oct;48(10):3738-41. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00722-10. Epub 2010 Aug 4. J Clin Microbiol. 2010. PMID: 20686078 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of Illumigene, Simplexa, and AmpliVue Clostridium difficile molecular assays for diagnosis of C. difficile infection.J Clin Microbiol. 2014 Mar;52(3):960-3. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02354-13. Epub 2013 Dec 18. J Clin Microbiol. 2014. PMID: 24352999 Free PMC article.
-
Recent advances in diagnostic microbiology.Semin Hematol. 2009 Jul;46(3):248-58. doi: 10.1053/j.seminhematol.2009.03.009. Semin Hematol. 2009. PMID: 19549577 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Bartlett, J. G. 2006. Narrative review: the new epidemic of Clostridium difficile-associated enteric disease. Ann. Intern. Med. 145758-764. - PubMed
-
- Benson, L., X. Song, J. Campos, and N. Singh. 2007. Changing epidemiology of Clostridium difficile-associated disease in children. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 281233-1235. - PubMed
-
- Bouza, E., T. Peláez, R. Alonso, P. Catalán, P. Muñoz, and M. R. Créixems. 2001. “Second-look” cytotoxicity: an evaluation of culture plus cytotoxin assay of Clostridium difficile isolates in the laboratory diagnosis of CDAD. J. Hosp. Infect. 48233-237. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Molecular Biology Databases