Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Mar-Apr;16(2):187-95.
doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2813. Epub 2008 Dec 11.

Mammography FastTrack: an intervention to facilitate reminders for breast cancer screening across a heterogeneous multi-clinic primary care network

Affiliations

Mammography FastTrack: an intervention to facilitate reminders for breast cancer screening across a heterogeneous multi-clinic primary care network

William T Lester et al. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009 Mar-Apr.

Abstract

Health care information technology can be a means to improve quality and efficiency in the primary care setting. However, merely applying technology without addressing how it fits into provider workflow and existing systems is unlikely to achieve improvement goals. Improving quality of primary care, such as cancer screening rates, requires addressing barriers at system, provider, and patient levels. The authors report the development, implementation, and preliminary use of a new breast cancer screening outreach program in a large multicenter primary care network. This installation paired population-based surveillance with customized information delivery based on a validated model linking patients to providers and practices. In the first six months, 86% of physicians and all case managers voluntarily participated in the program. Providers intervened in 83% of the mammogram-overdue population by initiating mailed reminders or deferring contact. Overall, 63% of patients were successfully contacted. Systematic population-based efforts are promising tools to improve preventative care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Provider mammography review interface.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Practice delegate interface.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. World Health Organization Screening for Breast Cancerhttp://www.who.int/cancer/detection/breastcancer/en/Accessed December 4, 2007.
    1. Tabar L, Fagerberg G, Duffy SW, Day NE. The Swedish two county trial of mammographic screening for breast cancer: recent results and calculation of benefit J Epidemiol Community Health 1989;43:107-114. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tabar L, Fagerberg G, Chen HH, et al. Efficacy of breast cancer screening by age. New results from the Swedish Two-County Trial. Cancer 1995;75:2507-2517. - PubMed
    1. Kerlikowske K. Efficacy of screening mammography. A meta-analysis [see comment]. JAMA 1995;273:149-154. - PubMed
    1. Elwood M, Cox B, Richardson A. The effectiveness of breast cancer screening by mammography in younger women: correction[Erratum for Online J Curr Clin Trials 1993;Feb 25:Doc No 32; PMID: 8305999] Online J Curr Clin Trials 1994. Doc No 121. - PubMed