Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2008 Dec 16;149(12):869-78.
doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-149-12-200812160-00006.

Effects of home-based pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomized trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Effects of home-based pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomized trial

François Maltais et al. Ann Intern Med. .

Abstract

Background: Home-based rehabilitation is a promising approach to improve access to pulmonary rehabilitation.

Objective: To assess whether self-monitored, home-based rehabilitation is as effective as outpatient, hospital-based rehabilitation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

Design: Randomized, multicenter, noninferiority trial.

Setting: 10 academic and community medical centers in Canada.

Patients: 252 patients with moderate to severe COPD.

Intervention: After a 4-week education program, patients took part in home-based rehabilitation or outpatient, hospital-based rehabilitation for 8 weeks. They were followed for 40 weeks to complete the 1-year study.

Measurements: The primary outcome was the change in Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire dyspnea subscale score at 1 year. The primary analysis took a modified intention-to-treat approach by using all patients who provided data at the specified follow-up time, regardless of their level of adherence. The analysis used regression modeling that adjusted for the effects of center, sex, and baseline level. All differences were computed as home intervention minus outpatient intervention.

Results: Both interventions produced similar improvements in the Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire dyspnea subscale at 1 year: improvement in dyspnea of 0.62 (95% CI, 0.43 to 0.80) units in the home intervention (n = 107) and 0.46 (CI, 0.28 to 0.64) units in the outpatient intervention (n = 109). The difference between the 2 treatments at 1 year was small and clinically unimportant. The 95% CI of the difference did not exceed the prespecified noninferiority margin of 0.5: difference in dyspnea score of 0.16 (CI, -0.08 to 0.40). Most adverse events were related to COPD exacerbations. No serious adverse event was considered to be related to the study intervention.

Limitation: The contribution of the educational program to the improvement in health status and exercise tolerance cannot be ascertained.

Conclusion: Home rehabilitation is a useful, equivalent alternative to outpatient rehabilitation in patients with COPD.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Summary for patients in

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources