Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2008 Dec;11(4):384-90.
doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2008.00507.x.

Patient evaluations of accessibility and co-ordination in general practice in Europe

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Patient evaluations of accessibility and co-ordination in general practice in Europe

Michel Wensing et al. Health Expect. 2008 Dec.

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether patient evaluations of the accessibility to general practice and co-ordination with other care providers were associated with characteristics of general practice organizations.

Background: In 1998 patients across Europe perceived that small general practices have better accessibility than large practices. Since then a number of changes in primary care have had impact on accessibility and co-ordination of care.

Design, setting and participants: The study was based on data from the European Practice Assessment study, an observational study in 284 general practices in 10 countries in 2004.

Main outcome measures: Patient evaluations of general practice were measured with the 23-item Europep instrument, from which seven items on accessibility and co-ordination were selected in a principal factor analysis. Six practice characteristics were examined: percentage of female general practitioners, mean age of physicians, mean number of physician hours worked per week, number of general practitioners, number of care providers, urbanization level. Mixed regression models were applied, in which patients were clustered within practices, and practices within countries.

Results: Practices with a higher numbers of care providers received less positive patient evaluations (b= -0.112, P=0.004). The other practice characteristics were not related to patient evaluations. Only a small proportion of the total variation in patient evaluations of accessibility and co-ordination (1.8%) was explained by characteristics of the general practice organizations.

Conclusions: General practices have become larger in most developed countries in recent years, but patients seemed to prefer general practice organizations with fewer health professionals.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Grol R, Wensing M, Mainz J et al. Patients’ priorities with respect to general practice care: an international comparison. Family Practice, 1999; 16: 4–11. - PubMed
    1. Chapman JL, Zechel A, Carter YH, Abbott S. Systematic review of recent innovations in service provision to improve access to primary care. British Journal of General Practice, 2004; 54: 374–381. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hampson JP, Roberts RI, Morgan DA. Shared care: a review of the literature. Family Practice, 2002; 19: 53–56. - PubMed
    1. Hudak PL, McKeever P, Wright JG. The metaphor of patients as customers: implications for measuring satisfaction. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2003; 56: 103–108. - PubMed
    1. Schers H, Van den Hoogen H, Bor H, Grol R, Van den Bosch W. Familiarity with a GP and patients’ evaluations of care. A cross‐sectional study. Family Practice, 2005; 22: 15–19. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources