Routine programmed electrical stimulation in survivors of acute myocardial infarction for prediction of spontaneous ventricular tachyarrhythmias during follow-up: results, optimal stimulation protocol and cost-effective screening
- PMID: 1907984
- DOI: 10.1016/0735-1097(91)90802-g
Routine programmed electrical stimulation in survivors of acute myocardial infarction for prediction of spontaneous ventricular tachyarrhythmias during follow-up: results, optimal stimulation protocol and cost-effective screening
Abstract
Of 3,286 consecutive patients treated for acute myocardial infarction, electrophysiologic testing was performed in 1,209 survivors (37%) free of significant complications at the time of hospital discharge to determine their risk of spontaneous ventricular tachyarrhythmias during follow-up. Sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia was inducible by programmed electrical stimulation in 75 (6.2%). Antiarrhythmic therapy was not routinely prescribed regardless of the test results. During the 1st year of follow-up, 14 infarct survivors (19%) with inducible ventricular tachycardia experienced spontaneous ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation in the absence of new ischemia compared with 34 (2.9%) of those without inducible ventricular tachycardia (p less than 0.0005). During the extended follow-up period (median 28 months) of those with inducible ventricular tachycardia, 19 (25%) had a spontaneous electrical event; 37% of these first events were fatal. These results suggest that the most cost-effective strategy for predicting arrhythmia will be obtained by restricting electrophysiologic testing to infarct survivors whose left ventricular ejection fraction is less than 40% and using a stimulation protocol containing four extrastimuli. Electrophysiologic testing is the single best predictor of spontaneous ventricular tachyarrhythmias during follow-up in infarct survivors. The majority (94%) with a negative test benefit from the more reliable reassurance that all is well, whereas the 25% risk of electrical events in those with inducible ventricular tachycardia justifies a prospective trial of effective prophylactic antiarrhythmic interventions.
Comment in
-
Electrophysiologic studies during acute myocardial infarction: do they prognosticate?J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991 Sep;18(3):789-91. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(91)90803-h. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991. PMID: 1869742 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Value of programmed ventricular stimulation in predicting sudden death and sustained ventricular tachycardia in survivors of acute myocardial infarction.Am J Cardiol. 1996 Apr 1;77(9):673-80. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(97)89198-9. Am J Cardiol. 1996. PMID: 8651115
-
Prognostic significance of programmed ventricular stimulation in patients surviving complicated acute myocardial infarction: a prospective study.Am Heart J. 1992 Jul;124(1):87-96. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(92)90924-k. Am Heart J. 1992. PMID: 1615832
-
Risk stratification and management of patients with organic heart disease and nonsustained ventricular tachycardia: role of programmed stimulation, left ventricular ejection fraction, and the signal-averaged electrocardiogram.Am J Med. 1990 Jan;88(1N):35N-41N. Am J Med. 1990. PMID: 2368762
-
Electrophysiologic evaluation of antiarrhythmic therapy for ventricular tachyarrhythmias.Am J Cardiol. 1988 Oct 19;62(12):39H-45H. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(88)90339-6. Am J Cardiol. 1988. PMID: 3052008 Review.
-
Pharmacological therapy in coronary heart disease: prevention of life-threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmias and sudden cardiac death.Eur Heart J. 1993 Sep;14 Suppl E:107-19. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/14.suppl_e.107. Eur Heart J. 1993. PMID: 8223747 Review.
Cited by
-
[Limits and scopes of invasive risk stratification. Do we still need programmed ventricular stimulation?].Herz. 2009 Nov;34(7):528-38. doi: 10.1007/s00059-009-3294-6. Herz. 2009. PMID: 20091252 Review. German.
-
Surgery for ventricular tachycardia in patients undergoing surgical ventricular restoration: the Karolinska approach.J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2007 Sep;19(3):171-8. doi: 10.1007/s10840-007-9152-7. Epub 2007 Sep 9. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2007. PMID: 17828587
-
Programmed stimulation of the ventricles--back to the future.J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 1997 Dec;1(4):281-5. doi: 10.1023/a:1009776925302. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 1997. PMID: 9869981 Review. No abstract available.
-
Programmed ventricular stimulation after myocardial infarction does not help reduce the risk of ventricular events.Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 1996 Nov;10(5):549-56. doi: 10.1007/BF00050995. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 1996. PMID: 8950069 Clinical Trial.
-
Ventricular tachyarrhythmia recurrence in primary versus secondary implantable cardioverter-defibrillator patients and role of electrophysiology study.J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2014 Dec;41(3):195-202. doi: 10.1007/s10840-014-9941-8. Epub 2014 Sep 30. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2014. PMID: 25267274 Clinical Trial.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical