[Clinical effects of oocyte cryopreservation in assisted reproduction technology]
- PMID: 19080449
[Clinical effects of oocyte cryopreservation in assisted reproduction technology]
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the clinical effects of oocyte cryopreservation in assisted reproduction technology (ART).
Methods: 258 patients undergoing retrieval of more than 20 oocytes during in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) were divided into 2 groups:Group A, undergoing surplus oocytes cryopreservation (84 cycles) and Group B undergoing embryo cryopreservation (174 cycles) according to the patients' choices. Fertilization rate and clinical pregnancy rate of fresh embryo transfer cycle were compared between these two groups. Twenty-three infertile couples' frozen oocytes were thawed for further ART treatment. Among them, fifteen couples received embryo transfer using their own frozen-thawed oocytes, and other four couples used donated frozen-thawed oocytes. The survival rate, fertilization rate, cleavage rate, implantation rate, and clinical pregnancy rate of these 19 cycles were compared to the outcome of 56 frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles.
Results: The fertilization rate of Group A who underwent IVF was 65.9%, not significantly different from that of Group B who received IVF (66.9%, P > 0.05), and the fertilization rate of Group A who underwent ICSI was 71.6%, not significantly different from that of Group B who received ICSI (64.1%, P > 0.05). The clinical pregnancy rate (per embryo transfer cycle) of Group A who received IVF was 52.9%, not significantly different from that of Group B who received IVF (42.3%, P > 0.05), and the clinical pregnancy rate (per embryo transfer cycle) of Group A who received ICSI was 35.5%, not significantly different from that of Group B who received ICSI (34.4%, P > 0.05). The clinical pregnancy rate of frozen-thawed oocyte group (per embryo transfer cycle) was 47.4% (9/19). Four couples used donated frozen-thawed oocytes, two of them got clinical pregnancy and one of them had term delivery.
Conclusion: For women who undergo retrieval of more than 20 oocytes in IVF/ICSI, the clinical outcome of fresh embryo transfer cycle, such as fertilization rate and clinical pregnancy rate, are not influenced by oocyte cryopreservation and embryo cryopreservation. There is no significant difference in the clinical pregnancy rate (per embryo transfer cycle) between frozen-thawed oocyte group and frozen-thawed embryo group. Compared with embryo cryopreservation, oocyte cryopreservation has obvious advantages in fertility preservation and oocyte donation.
Similar articles
-
Cryopreserved oocytes of infertile couples undergoing assisted reproductive technology could be an important source of oocyte donation: a clinical report of successful pregnancies.Hum Reprod. 2005 Dec;20(12):3390-4. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dei262. Epub 2005 Aug 11. Hum Reprod. 2005. PMID: 16096321
-
[Effects of cryopreservation time and thawing method of human oocyte vitrification on the outcome of assisted reproduction].Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2010 Aug;45(8):578-82. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2010. PMID: 21029612 Chinese.
-
Cryobiology in human assisted reproductive technology. Would Hippocrates approve?Early Pregnancy (Cherry Hill). 2001 Jul;5(3):211-3. Early Pregnancy (Cherry Hill). 2001. PMID: 11753534
-
Human oocyte cryopreservation: a valid alternative to embryo cryopreservation?Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2004 Apr 5;113 Suppl 1:S24-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2003.11.006. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2004. PMID: 15041126 Review.
-
What is the 'ideal' duration of progesterone supplementation before the transfer of cryopreserved-thawed embryos in estrogen/progesterone replacement protocols?Hum Reprod. 2005 May;20(5):1127-34. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deh762. Epub 2005 Feb 3. Hum Reprod. 2005. PMID: 15695314 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources