How to use a clinical practice guideline
- PMID: 19084846
- DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.10.041
How to use a clinical practice guideline
Abstract
Purpose: Leading organizations increasingly recognize clinical practice guidelines as an important approach in promoting an evidence-based clinical practice of urology. In light of their considerable clinical, economic and medicolegal impact, guideline users should be confident that the guidelines were rigorously developed and address relevant patient questions. In this article we outline a practical approach for critically appraising a clinical practice guideline.
Materials and methods: We outline a 3-step approach to the assessment of a clinical practice guideline that answers the questions of whether the recommendations are valid, what the recommendations are and whether they will help in the treatment of an individual patient.
Results: To determine the adequacy of a clinical practice guideline, urologists should carefully review the rigor of the development process and its content. Important questions that relate to the validity of a guideline are whether, for specific questions, all important management options and outcomes were considered, and whether there was an explicit and sensible process to identify, select and combine all relevant evidence. Clinical practice guidelines should formally grade the quality of the available evidence for a given clinical question and outline a formal process of how the recommendations were derived. Value judgments made in the guideline development process about the relative importance of the potential benefits and harms of a given health care intervention should be made transparent to the reader. The recommendations made should be practical and should address important clinical issues. Furthermore, their strength should be graded to reflect the underlying uncertainty about the evidence and the values applied in the guideline development process.
Conclusions: The systematic approach presented in this article will allow urologists to critically appraise clinical practice guidelines. Determining the validity of the recommendations, understanding the recommendations and assessing their applicability to patients are 3 fundamental steps toward an evidence-based approach to using clinical practice guidelines.
Similar articles
-
Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management, part I: introduction and general considerations.Pain Physician. 2008 Mar-Apr;11(2):161-86. Pain Physician. 2008. PMID: 18354710 Review.
-
How to develop guidelines for clinical practice.Minerva Anestesiol. 2009 Sep;75(9):504-8. Epub 2008 Nov 11. Minerva Anestesiol. 2009. PMID: 19002086
-
How to use an article about a diagnostic test.J Urol. 2008 Aug;180(2):469-76. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.04.026. Epub 2008 Jun 11. J Urol. 2008. PMID: 18550109 Review.
-
An independent AGREE evaluation of the Occupational Medicine Practice Guidelines.Spine J. 2006 Jan-Feb;6(1):72-7. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2005.06.012. Spine J. 2006. PMID: 16413451
-
A critical review of clinical practice guidelines for the management of clinically localized prostate cancer.J Urol. 2008 Aug;180(2):451-9; discussion 460. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.04.004. Epub 2008 Jun 11. J Urol. 2008. PMID: 18550100 Review.
Cited by
-
How to critically appraise a clinical practice guideline.Indian J Urol. 2011 Oct;27(4):498-502. doi: 10.4103/0970-1591.91441. Indian J Urol. 2011. PMID: 22279318 Free PMC article.
-
Differential diagnosis of thrombotic microangiopathy in nephrology.BMC Nephrol. 2017 Oct 28;18(1):324. doi: 10.1186/s12882-017-0727-y. BMC Nephrol. 2017. PMID: 29080561 Free PMC article.
-
Users' guide to the surgical literature: how to evaluate clinical practice guidelines.Can J Surg. 2014 Aug;57(4):280-6. doi: 10.1503/cjs.029612. Can J Surg. 2014. PMID: 25078935 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Guideline-based management of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.Indian J Urol. 2015 Oct-Dec;31(4):320-6. doi: 10.4103/0970-1591.163305. Indian J Urol. 2015. PMID: 26604443 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Education and training in evidence-based urology.World J Urol. 2011 Jun;29(3):325-9. doi: 10.1007/s00345-011-0651-x. Epub 2011 Feb 4. World J Urol. 2011. PMID: 21293963 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources