Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1991 Sep;146(3):794-7.
doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)37923-5.

A randomized comparative study of the prophylactic use of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole versus netilmycin-metronidazole in transrectal prostatic biopsy

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

A randomized comparative study of the prophylactic use of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole versus netilmycin-metronidazole in transrectal prostatic biopsy

I W Fong et al. J Urol. 1991 Sep.

Abstract

An open randomized study was done to compare the prophylactic value of single doses of netilmycin-metronidazole versus trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole in the prevention of postoperative infections associated with transrectal prostatic biopsy. Of 117 patients enrolled in the study 101 were evaluated and of these patients 47 received netilmycin-metronidazole and 54 received trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. The bacteremia rate in the netilmycin-metronidazole group was 28% (13 of 47 patients) with a 95% confidence interval of 18 to 42% and in the trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole group it was 37% (20 of 54) with a confidence interval of 26 to 50% (p = 0.43). None of the patients with bacteremia was symptomatic. Urinary tract infection rates were greater in the netilmycin-metronidazole group: 17% (8 of 47 patients) versus 2% (1 of 54) in the trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole group, p = 0.01. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (cotrimoxazole) is a better choice as an antimicrobial prophylaxis for patients undergoing transrectal prostatic biopsy.

PubMed Disclaimer