Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2008;31(5):487-99.
doi: 10.1080/10790268.2008.11753644.

Outcome measures for gait and ambulation in the spinal cord injury population

Affiliations
Review

Outcome measures for gait and ambulation in the spinal cord injury population

Amie B Jackson et al. J Spinal Cord Med. 2008.

Abstract

Background: At the 2006 National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research (NIDRR) sponsored pre-conference on spinal cord injury (SCI) outcomes, several gait and ambulation measures were evaluated for utility in clinical practice, validity, and reliability as research measurement tools. The Conference Subcommittee on Gait and Ambulation chose to review the Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury II (WISCI II), 50-Foot Walk Test (50FTWT), 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT), 10-Meter Walk Test (10MWT), and Functional Independence Measure-Locomotor (FIM-L).

Methods: A subcommittee of international experts evaluated each instrument for test construct, administration, population applicability, reliability, sensitivity to change, and validity. Evaluations for each outcome measure were compiled, distributed to the whole committee, and then further reviewed with addition of comments and recommendations for consensus. An audience of experts voted on the validity and usefulness of each measure.

Results: WISCI II and 10MWT were found to be the most valid and clinically useful tests to measure improvement in gait for patients with SCI. FIM-L had little utility and validity for research in SCI. 6MWT and 50FTWT were found to be useful but in need of further validation or changes for the SCI population.

Conclusion: A combination of the 10MWT and WISCI II would provide the most valid measure of improvement in gait and ambulation in as much as objective changes of speed, and functional capacity allow for interval measurement. To provide the most comprehensive battery, however, it will be important to include a measure of endurance such as the 6MWT. Further validation and study should be devoted to WISCI II, 10MWT, and 6MWT as primary outcome measures for gait in SCI.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury II.
Figure 1
Figure 1. Continued.
Figure 2
Figure 2. 6-Minute Walk Test.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Functional Independence Measure-Locomotion: Walk.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Continued.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Audience Voting Results.

References

    1. Johnston MV, Graves DE. Towards guidelines for evaluation of measures: an introduction with application to spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med. 2008;31:13–26. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ditunno JF, Ditunno P, Graziani V, et al. Walking index for spinal cord injury (WISCI): an international multicenter validity and reliability study Spinal Cord. 200038 (4) 234–243. - PubMed
    1. van Hedel H, Wirz M, Dietz V.Assessing walking ability in subjects with spinal cord injury: validity and reliability of 3 walking tests Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 200586 (2) 190–196. - PubMed
    1. van Hedel H, Wirz M, Curt A.Improving walking assessment in subjects with an incomplete spinal cord injury: responsiveness Spinal Cord. 200644 (6) 352–356. - PubMed
    1. Morganti B, Scivoletto G, Ditunno P, Ditunno J, Molinari M.Walking index for spinal cord injury (WISCI): criterion validation Spinal Cord. 200543 (1) 27–33. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms