Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Jan 13;100(1):56-62.
doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604819. Epub 2008 Dec 16.

A prospective study of peri-diagnostic and surgical wait times for patients with presumptive colorectal, lung, or prostate cancer

Affiliations

A prospective study of peri-diagnostic and surgical wait times for patients with presumptive colorectal, lung, or prostate cancer

E Grunfeld et al. Br J Cancer. .

Abstract

The objective of this study was to prospectively measure peri-diagnostic and surgical time intervals for patients with suspected colorectal, lung, or prostate cancer. Prospective eligible patients were referred to a regional hospital in Ottawa, Canada between February 2004 and February 2005 for diagnostic assessment of presumptive colorectal, lung, or prostate cancer. Chart abstractions were used to measure nine time intervals; the primary interval was the date of referral for diagnostic assessment to the date the patient was informed of the diagnosis. Health-related quality-of-life (HRQL) was assessed 5 days following the patient being informed of their diagnosis. The median (IQR) time for the primary interval was 71 (30-110), 37 (29-49), and 81 (56-100) days for colorectal, lung, and prostate patients, respectively (Kruskal-Wallis P=0.0001). This interval was significantly less for colorectal patients diagnosed with cancer than for those without cancer (median difference=59.0 days; Wilcoxon P=0.003). No differences in HRQL existed for patients with cancer and those without. Colorectal and prostate patients wait longer between referral for suspected cancer and being informed of their diagnosis than current recommendations. The shorter diagnostic intervals for colorectal patients with cancer suggest clinicians have an effective process for triaging patients referred for diagnostic assessment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Peri-diagnostic and treatment time intervals.

References

    1. Aaronson NK (1995) EORTC QLQ C-30 Scoring Manual. European Organisation for Research and Treatment into Cancer: Amsterdam, NL
    1. Alberta Waitlist Registry (n.d.) Alberta Wait Time Goals. http://www.ahw.gov.ab.ca/waitlist/AWRInfoPage.jsp?pageID=20
    1. Allgar VL, Neal RD (2005) Delays in the diagnosis of six cancers: analysis of data from the national survey of NHS patients: cancer. Br J Cancer 92: 1959–1970 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Benedict S, Williams RD, Baron PL (1994) Recalled anxiety: from discovery to diagnosis of a benign breast mass. Oncol Nurs Forum 21: 1723–1727 - PubMed
    1. Berrino F, DeAngelis R, Sant M, Rosso S, Lasota MB, Coebergh JW, Santaquilani M, the EUROCARE Working Group (2007) Survival for eight major cancers and all cancers combined for European adults diagnosed in 1995–99: results of the EUROCARE-4 study. Lancet Oncol 8: 773–783 - PubMed

Publication types