Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Aug;15(4):265-9.
doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572007000400005.

Adhesives with different pHs: effect on the MTBS of chemically activated and light-activated composites to human dentin

Affiliations

Adhesives with different pHs: effect on the MTBS of chemically activated and light-activated composites to human dentin

André Mallmann et al. J Appl Oral Sci. 2007 Aug.

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the bond strength between human dentin and composites, using two light-activated single-bottle total-etch adhesive systems with different pHs combined with chemically activated and light-activated-composites. The tested hypothesis was that the dentin bond strength is not influenced by an adhesive system of low pH, combined with chemically activated or light-activated composites.

Material and method: Flat dentin surfaces of twenty-eight human third molars were allocated in 4 groups (n=7), depending on the adhesive system: (One Step Plus-OS and Prime & Bond NT-PB) and composite (light-activated Filtek Z-100 [Z100] and chemically activated Bisfil 2B [B2B]). Each adhesive system was applied on acid-etched dentin and then one of the composites was added to form a 5 mm-high resin block. The specimens were stored in tap water (37 degrees C/24 h) and sectioned into two axes, x and y. This was done with a diamond disk under coolant irrigation to obtain beams with a cross-section area of approximately 0.8 mm(2). Each specimen was then attached to a custom-made device and submitted to the microtensile test (1 mm*min-1). Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey's tests (p<0.05).

Results: The anticipated hypothesis was not confirmed (p<0.0001). The bond strengths (MPa) were not statistically different between the two adhesive systems when light-activated composite was used (OS+Z100 = 24.7+/-7.1 feminine; PB+Z100 = 23.8+/-5.7 feminine). However, with use of the chemically activated composite (B2B), PB (7.8+/-3.6b MPa) showed significantly lower dentin bond strengths than OS (32.2+/-7.6 feminine).

Conclusion: The low pH of the adhesive system can affect the bond of chemically activated composite to dentin. On the other hand, under the present conditions, the low pH did not seem to affect the bond of light-activated composites to dentin significantly.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

References

    1. Abu-Hanna A, Gordan VV. Evaluation of etching time on dentin bond strength using single bottle bonding systems. J Adhes Dent. 2004;6:105–110. - PubMed
    1. Buonocore MG. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res. 1955;34:849–853. - PubMed
    1. Bolhuis PB, de Gee AJ, Kleverlaan CJ, El Zohairy AA, Feilzer AJ. Contraction stress and bond strength to dentin for compatible and incompatible combinations of bonding systems and chemical and light-cured core build-up resin composites. Dent Mater. 2006;22:223–233. - PubMed
    1. Cadenaro M, Antoniolli F, Sauro S, Tay FR, Di Lenarda R, Prati C, et al. Degree of conversion and permeability of dental adhesives. Eur J Oral Sci. 2005;113:525–530. - PubMed
    1. Carrilho MR, Tay FR, Pahsley DH, Tjaderhane l, Carvalho RM. Mechanical stability of resin-dentin bond components. Dent Mater. 2005;21(3):232–241. - PubMed