Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2008 Dec 17:7:258.
doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-7-258.

Costs and consequences of large-scale vector control for malaria

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Costs and consequences of large-scale vector control for malaria

Joshua O Yukich et al. Malar J. .

Abstract

Background: Five large insecticide-treated net (ITN) programmes and two indoor residual spraying (IRS) programmes were compared using a standardized costing methodology.

Methods: Costs were measured locally or derived from existing studies and focused on the provider perspective, but included the direct costs of net purchases by users, and are reported in 2005 USD. Effectiveness was estimated by combining programme outputs with standard impact indicators.

Findings: Conventional ITNs: The cost per treated net-year of protection ranged from USD 1.21 in Eritrea to USD 6.05 in Senegal. The cost per child death averted ranged from USD 438 to USD 2,199 when targeting to children was successful.Long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLIN) of five years duration: The cost per treated-net year of protection ranged from USD 1.38 in Eritrea to USD 1.90 in Togo. The cost per child death averted ranged from USD 502 to USD 692.IRS: The costs per person-year of protection for all ages were USD 3.27 in KwaZulu Natal and USD 3.90 in Mozambique. If only children under five years of age were included in the denominator the cost per person-year of protection was higher: USD 23.96 and USD 21.63. As a result, the cost per child death averted was higher than for ITNs: USD 3,933-4,357.

Conclusion: Both ITNs and IRS are highly cost-effective vector control strategies. Integrated ITN free distribution campaigns appeared to be the most efficient way to rapidly increase ITN coverage. Other approaches were as or more cost-effective, and appeared better suited to "keep-up" coverage levels. ITNs are more cost-effective than IRS for highly endemic settings, especially if high ITN coverage can be achieved with some demographic targeting.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Cost-effectiveness results of shifting to long-lasting insecticidal nets. Cost-effectiveness results of shifting to three-year (USD 5) or five-year (USD 7) long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) relative to conventional ITN estimates. LLIN CE estimates do not include protection from re-treatment kits but may include some costs associated with their distribution (see main text).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lengeler C, Sharp B. Indoor Residual Spraying and Insecticide-Treated Nets. In: Murphy C, Ringheim K, Woldehanna S, Volmink J, editor. Reducing Malaria's Burden: evidence of effectiveness for decision makers. Washington, D.C.: Global Health Council; 2003. pp. 17–24.
    1. Roll Back Malaria Partnership Global Strategic Plan: Roll Back Malaria 2005–2015 Geneva. 2005.
    1. Curtis C, Mnzava A. Treated nets vs house spraying. Bull World Health Organ. 2001;79:687. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lengeler C. Comparison of malaria control interventions. Bull World Health Organ. 2001;79:77. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Curtis C, Maxwell C, Lemnge M, Kilama WL, Steketee RW, Hawley WA, Bergevin Y, Campbell CC, Sachs J, Teklehaimanot A, Ochola S, Guyatt H, Snow RW. Scaling-up coverage with insecticide-treated nets against malaria in Africa: who should pay? Lancet Infect Dis. 2003;3:304–307. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(03)00612-1. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types