Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Dec;101(12):598-604.
doi: 10.1258/jrsm.2008.080103.

Can clinicians benefit from patient satisfaction surveys? Evaluating the NSF for Older People, 2005-2006

Affiliations

Can clinicians benefit from patient satisfaction surveys? Evaluating the NSF for Older People, 2005-2006

Steve Lliffe et al. J R Soc Med. 2008 Dec.

Abstract

Background: A transformation of healthcare is underway, from a sellers' market to a consumers' market, where the satisfaction of the patient's needs is part of the definition of quality. Patient satisfaction surveys are widely used to judge service quality, but clinicians are sceptical about them because they are too often poorly designed measures that do not lead to improvements in the quality of care.

Aim: To explore the use of patient satisfaction survey data in identifying problems with the provision of inpatient care for older people.

Methods: A case study using secondary analysis of postal survey data about older people's experiences of health and social care services, obtained during the evaluation of the National Service Framework for Older People in 2005-2006. The survey asked about experiences of inpatient care and of discharge from hospital, and sought perceptions of the avoidability of the admission.

Settings and participants: A total of 4170 people aged 50 years and over returned a postal questionnaire in six local authority areas of England. Responses from 584 who had experienced a recent overnight stay in hospital are reported and discussed.

Findings: The response rate was 35%, ranging from 26% to 44% in the six areas surveyed. The great majority of those who had recent direct experience of inpatient care reported that they had been engaged in decision-making, that staff promoted their independence and maintained their dignity. There were widespread examples, however, of the opposite experiences. Discharge from hospital was problematic for about one-third of survey respondents with this experience, and there were different accounts of poorly managed discharges from all areas.

Conclusions: Case studies using local survey data can be used as formative assessments of services. The response rate to the survey and the likelihood of responder bias mean that patient satisfaction survey data of this sort cannot be used to judge or compare services in a summative way, but can highlight areas where remedial action is needed. Small-scale local surveys may seem to lack the robustness of larger studies, but do identify similar areas of concern. Commissioners and clinicians could use the findings of such surveys to inform dialogues about the quality of hospital care for older people.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Department of Health. National Service Framework for Older People. London: Department of Health; 2001. See http://www.dh.gov.uk/assetRoot/04/07/12/83/04071283.pdf.
    1. Department of Health. Better health in old age: Report from Professor Ian Philp. London: Department of Health; 2004.
    1. Department of Health. A new ambition for old age: Next steps in implementing the National Service Framework for Older People. London: Department of Health; 2006.
    1. Healthcare Commission. Caring for Dignity. London: Healthcare Commission; 2007.
    1. World Health Organization. Guidelines for Rapid Appraisal to Assess Community Health Needs. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1992.

Publication types