Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Dec;14(12):2089-104.
doi: 10.1089/ten.tea.2007.0383.

Evaluation criteria for musculoskeletal and craniofacial tissue engineering constructs: a conference report

Collaborators

Evaluation criteria for musculoskeletal and craniofacial tissue engineering constructs: a conference report

Functional Tissue Engineering Conference Group. Tissue Eng Part A. 2008 Dec.

Abstract

Over the past 20 years, tissue engineering (TE) has evolved into a thriving research and commercial development field. However, applying TE strategies to musculoskeletal (MSK) and craniofacial tissues has been particularly challenging since these tissues must also transmit loads during activities of daily living. To address this need, organizers invited a small group of bioengineers, surgeons, biologists, and material scientists from academia, industry, and government to participate in a two and half-day conference to develop general and tissue-specific criteria for evaluating new concepts and tissue-engineered constructs, including threshold values of success. Participants were assigned to four breakout groups representing commonly injured tissues, including tendon and ligament, articular cartilage, meniscus and temporomandibular joint, and bone and intervertebral disc. Working in multidisciplinary teams, participants first carefully defined one or two important unmet clinical needs for each tissue type, including current standards of care and the potential impact of TE solutions. The groups then sought to identify important parameters for evaluating repair outcomes in preclinical studies and to specify minimally acceptable values for these parameters. The importance of in vitro TE studies was then discussed in the context of these preclinical studies. Where data were not currently available from clinical, preclinical, or culture studies, the groups sought to identify important areas of preclinical research needed to speed the development process. This report summarizes the findings of the conference.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.
Inverted pyramids showing opportunities and needs by the National Institutes of Health and the private sector. Slide originates from Dr. Zerhouni's presentation, “NIH at the crossroads: Strategies for the future.”
FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.
Process followed in developing evaluation criteria recommendations.

References

    1. Fung Y.C. Fox C.F. NSF Workshop. In: Skalak R., editor; Tissue Engineering. New York: Alan R. Liss, Inc.; 1988.
    1. Aroen A. Loken S. Heir S. Alvik E. Ekeland A. Granlund O.G. Engebretsen L. Articular cartilage lesions in 993 consecutive knee arthroscopies. Am J Sports Med. 2004;32:211–215. - PubMed
    1. Arthritis Foundation. Disease center. http://www.arthritis.org/conditions/DiseaseCenter/oa.asp. 2004. http://www.arthritis.org/conditions/DiseaseCenter/oa.asp
    1. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Osteoarthritis. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Fact Sheet. http://orthoinfo.aaos.org/fact/thr_report.cfm?Thread_ID=365&topcategory=.... 2004. http://orthoinfo.aaos.org/fact/thr_report.cfm?Thread_ID=365&topcategory=...
    1. American College of Rheumatology. Osteoarthritis. http://www.rheumatology.org/public/factsheets/oa.asp?aud=pat. 2004. http://www.rheumatology.org/public/factsheets/oa.asp?aud=pat

Publication types