Assessment of English letters' legibility using image descriptors
- PMID: 19093622
- DOI: 10.2466/pms.107.2.618-628
Assessment of English letters' legibility using image descriptors
Abstract
The study derived seven descriptors from the pixel matrices of both the uppercase and lowercase forms of the 26 letters in the English alphabet in the regular and italic versions of the most commonly used font, Times New Roman. A factor analysis of the seven descriptors showed that a two-factor solution of letter width and height explained 76.6% of the variance. Legibility threshold of the 26 letters in the regular and italic Times Roman font and in two-case forms were collected to specify effects of letter width and height. 20 university students, 10 women and 10 men, with a mean age of 24.1 yr. (SD = 1.6) participated. They identified letters displayed initially on a PC screen at a minimum font size and enlarged gradually until the participant correctly recognized the letter. Analysis showed letters of greater width or height were more legible than those of smaller width or height. Given an oblique effect, letters in the italic Times Roman font had significantly greater width but were less legible than those in the regular font.
Similar articles
-
Applying image descriptors to the assessment of legibility in Chinese characters.Ergonomics. 2003 Jun 20;46(8):825-41. doi: 10.1080/0014013031000109214. Ergonomics. 2003. PMID: 12745981 Clinical Trial.
-
Text legibility and the letter superiority effect.Hum Factors. 2005 Winter;47(4):797-815. doi: 10.1518/001872005775570998. Hum Factors. 2005. PMID: 16553067
-
The effects of age, viewing distance, display type, font type, colour contrast and number of syllables on the legibility of Korean characters.Ergonomics. 2011 May;54(5):453-65. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2011.568635. Ergonomics. 2011. PMID: 21547790
-
Serifs and font legibility.Vision Res. 2005 Nov;45(23):2926-33. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2005.06.013. Vision Res. 2005. PMID: 16099015 Free PMC article.
-
How to design font size for older adults: A systematic literature review with a mobile device.Front Psychol. 2022 Aug 1;13:931646. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.931646. eCollection 2022. Front Psychol. 2022. PMID: 35978796 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources