Economics and cost of care of stone disease
- PMID: 19095200
- DOI: 10.1053/j.ackd.2008.10.002
Economics and cost of care of stone disease
Abstract
Nephrolithiasis is associated with a high cost to society because of the high prevalence of disease and high recurrence rates. The total annual medical expenditures for urolithiasis in the United States were estimated at $2.1 billion in 2000. The cost of stone disease reflects the cost of health care services required to manage stone disease and the rate of utilization. Although the care of individuals with urolithiasis has shifted from the inpatient to the outpatient setting and the hospital length of stay has decreased, costs continue to rise because of increases in the prevalence of kidney stones. There are 2 potential areas that would allow for a decrease in stone disease-related costs, lower health care-related costs, and decreased prevalence of stone disease. Reducing treatment-related costs are unlikely to provide a solution to the high cost of caring for stone disease because physician-fee reductions did not result in a significant reduction in costs. Furthermore, there are no significant advancements in surgical technique or technologies in the horizon. One area of cost savings could be to develop better guidelines for acute management, optimizing timing for surgery in acute settings and increasing the practice of medical expulsive therapy. Another area with potential to reduce costs is the reduction of overall stone burden through the prevention of new stones or recurrences. Strategies for primary prevention in high-risk populations have not been studied and represent an area for future research. More efforts should be made to improve medical management of stone formers. These efforts include improving dietary recommendations, identifying barriers to evaluations and treatment of recurrent stone formers, improving patient compliance with recommendations, and development of new medications.
Similar articles
-
Primary prevention of nephrolithiasis is cost-effective for a national healthcare system.BJU Int. 2012 Dec;110(11 Pt C):E1060-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11212.x. Epub 2012 Jun 11. BJU Int. 2012. PMID: 22686216
-
Economic costs of diabetes in the U.S. In 2007.Diabetes Care. 2008 Mar;31(3):596-615. doi: 10.2337/dc08-9017. Diabetes Care. 2008. PMID: 18308683 Review.
-
Increased water intake as a prevention strategy for recurrent urolithiasis: major impact of compliance on cost-effectiveness.J Urol. 2013 Mar;189(3):935-9. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.08.254. Epub 2012 Sep 24. J Urol. 2013. PMID: 23017509
-
National health care costs of peripheral arterial disease in the Medicare population.Vasc Med. 2008 Aug;13(3):209-15. doi: 10.1177/1358863X08089277. Vasc Med. 2008. PMID: 18687757
-
Economics of stone management.Urol Clin North Am. 2007 Aug;34(3):443-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ucl.2007.04.008. Urol Clin North Am. 2007. PMID: 17678993 Review.
Cited by
-
Current practices in the management of patients with ureteral calculi in the emergency room of a university hospital.Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2012;67(5):415-8. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2012(05)02. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2012. PMID: 22666782 Free PMC article.
-
Betel Nut Chewing Is Associated with the Risk of Kidney Stone Disease.J Pers Med. 2022 Jan 18;12(2):126. doi: 10.3390/jpm12020126. J Pers Med. 2022. PMID: 35207614 Free PMC article.
-
Economic Considerations in the Management of Nephrolithiasis.Curr Urol Rep. 2020 Mar 31;21(5):18. doi: 10.1007/s11934-020-00971-6. Curr Urol Rep. 2020. PMID: 32236700 Review.
-
Nephrolithiasis and loss of kidney function.Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2013 Jul;22(4):390-6. doi: 10.1097/MNH.0b013e32836214b9. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2013. PMID: 23736840 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Hypercalciuria, hyperoxaluria, and hypocitraturia screening from random urine samples in patients with calcium lithiasis.Urol Res. 2012 Oct;40(5):511-5. doi: 10.1007/s00240-012-0474-2. Epub 2012 Apr 7. Urol Res. 2012. PMID: 22484727
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical