Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2009 Mar;39(3):239-44.
doi: 10.1007/s00247-008-1080-x. Epub 2008 Dec 19.

Harmonic voiding urosonography with a second-generation contrast agent for the diagnosis of vesicoureteral reflux

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Harmonic voiding urosonography with a second-generation contrast agent for the diagnosis of vesicoureteral reflux

Frederica Papadopoulou et al. Pediatr Radiol. 2009 Mar.

Abstract

Background: Voiding urosonography with harmonic imaging (VUS HI) has been introduced as a sensitive and radiation-free imaging method for the diagnosis and follow-up of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) in children.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the sensitivity of VUS HI using a second-generation US contrast agent compared to standard voiding cystourethrography (VCUG).

Materials and methods: A total of 228 children with 463 kidney-ureter units (KUUs) underwent two cycles of VUS HI and two cycles of VCUG at the same session. VUS HI was performed after intravesical administration of 1 ml of a second-generation US contrast agent (sulphur-hexafluoride gas microbubbles, SonoVue, Bracco, Italy). For statistical analysis we used McNemar's test, Student's t-test and k coefficient tests.

Results: VUR was shown in 161/463 (34.7%) KUUs, 57 by both methods, 90 only by VUS, and 14 only by VCUG. Concordance in findings regarding the presence or absence of VUR was found in 359/463 (77.5%) KUUs (k=0.40). The difference in the detection rate of reflux between the two methods was significant (P<0.01). More importantly, reflux missed by VCUG was of higher grade (2 grade I, 65 grade II, 19 grade III, 4 grade IV) than that missed by VUS (8 grade I, 5 grade II, 1 grade III).

Conclusion: VUS HI and a second-generation contrast agent improved the identification of reflux in children. Our data reveal a higher sensitivity of the method compared to VCUG. Thus it can be used as an alternative radiation-free imaging method.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Pediatr Radiol. 2005 Jan;35(1):73-8 - PubMed
    1. Eur Radiol. 2006 Nov;16(11):2521-6 - PubMed
    1. Eur J Radiol. 2002 Aug;43(2):122-8 - PubMed
    1. Ultraschall Med. 2008 Feb;29(1):53-9 - PubMed
    1. J Urol. 2002 Oct;168(4 Pt 2):1711-5; discussion 1715 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources