Occult surgical glove perforations in otolaryngology-head and neck surgery
- PMID: 1909877
- DOI: 10.1001/archotol.1991.01870200104018
Occult surgical glove perforations in otolaryngology-head and neck surgery
Abstract
With the advent of the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome crisis, it has become imperative that all surgeons minimize their risk of direct contact with the patient's body fluids. In the course of performing surgery, perforations are frequently created in surgical gloves, which often go unnoticed. This study determined the frequency with which occult glove perforations occurred in 134 consecutive head and neck surgical procedures. One thousand fifty gloves (650 gloves used in surgery, 400 unused control gloves) were analyzed for the presence of perforations large enough to permit the passage of fluid. An unrecognized glove perforation was detected in 25% of surgical cases. The duration of surgery correlated strongly and positively with the incidence of perforation. Perforation rates varied widely for specific types of procedures, and are reported for each of the five subdivisions within otolaryngology-head and neck surgery. The implications of these results are described, and recommendations for the use of protective measures, especially in reference to the use of double-gloving, are made.
Similar articles
-
Surgical glove perforations in otolaryngology: prevention with cut-resistant gloves.Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1993 Jan;108(1):91-5. doi: 10.1177/019459989310800114. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1993. PMID: 8437881
-
Occult glove perforations: frequency during interventional radiologic procedures.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1992 Jul;159(1):131-5. doi: 10.2214/ajr.159.1.1609687. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1992. PMID: 1609687
-
Intraoperative glove perforation--single versus double gloving in protection against skin contamination.Postgrad Med J. 2001 Jul;77(909):458-60. doi: 10.1136/pmj.77.909.458. Postgrad Med J. 2001. PMID: 11423598 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Double gloving for self-protection in high-risk surgeries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 8;14(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s13643-025-02760-z. Syst Rev. 2025. PMID: 40057774 Free PMC article.
-
[Surgical gloves--how well do the protect against infections?].Gesundheitswesen. 1999 Aug-Sep;61(8-9):398-403. Gesundheitswesen. 1999. PMID: 10535220 Review. German.
Cited by
-
Risk of blood contact through surgical gloves in aesthetic procedures.Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1993 Spring;17(2):167-8. doi: 10.1007/BF02274739. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1993. PMID: 8517225
-
Occult glove perforation during ophthalmic surgery.Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1992;90:71-91; discussion 92-5. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1992. PMID: 1494836 Free PMC article.
-
Surgeon-patient barrier efficiency monitored with an electronic device in three surgical settings.World J Surg. 2001 Sep;25(9):1101-8. doi: 10.1007/BF03215854. World J Surg. 2001. PMID: 11571942 Clinical Trial.
-
Avoiding exposure to HIV and hepatitis.BMJ. 1993 Jan 30;306(6873):335. doi: 10.1136/bmj.306.6873.335-b. BMJ. 1993. PMID: 8461667 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Use of double gloves to protect the surgeon from blood contact during aesthetic procedures.Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1995 May-Jun;19(3):265-7. doi: 10.1007/BF00451102. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1995. PMID: 7668175
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical