Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Dec 22:8:269.
doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-269.

In-reach specialist nursing teams for residential care homes: uptake of services, impact on care provision and cost-effectiveness

Affiliations

In-reach specialist nursing teams for residential care homes: uptake of services, impact on care provision and cost-effectiveness

Ala Szczepura et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: A joint NHS-Local Authority initiative in England designed to provide a dedicated nursing and physiotherapy in-reach team (IRT) to four residential care homes has been evaluated. The IRT supported 131 residents and maintained 15 'virtual' beds for specialist nursing in these care homes.

Methods: Data captured prospectively (July 2005 to June 2007) included: numbers of referrals; reason for referral; outcome (e.g. admission to IRT bed, short-term IRT support); length of stay in IRT; prevented hospital admissions; early hospital discharges; avoided nursing home transfers; and detection of unrecognised illnesses. An economic analysis was undertaken.

Results: 733 referrals were made during the 2 years (range 0.5 to 13.0 per resident per annum) resulting in a total of 6,528 visits. Two thirds of referrals aimed at maintaining the resident's independence in the care home. According to expert panel assessment, 197 hospital admissions were averted over the period; 20 early discharges facilitated; and 28 resident transfers to a nursing home prevented. Detection of previously unrecognised illnesses accounted for a high number of visits. Investment in IRT equalled 44.38 pounds per resident per week. Savings through reduced hospital admissions, early discharges, delayed transfers to nursing homes, and identification of previously unrecognised illnesses are conservatively estimated to produce a final reduction in care cost of 6.33 pounds per resident per week. A sensitivity analysis indicates this figure might range from a weekly overall saving of 36.90 pounds per resident to a 'worst case' estimate of 2.70 pounds extra expenditure per resident per week.Evaluation early in implementation may underestimate some cost-saving activities and greater savings may emerge over a longer time period. Similarly, IRT costs may reduce over time due to the potential for refinement of team without major loss in effectiveness.

Conclusion: Introduction of a specialist nursing in-reach team for residential homes is at least cost neutral and, in all probability, cost saving. Further benefits include development of new skills in the care home workforce and enhanced quality of care. Residents are enabled to stay in familiar surroundings rather than unnecessarily spending time in hospital or being transferred to a higher dependency nursing home setting.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Main Primary and Secondary Diagnoses for In-Reach Team Referrals. (a) Six Most Frequent Primary Diagnoses (% of 334 cases with primary diagnosis coded). (b) Five Most Frequent Secondary Diagnoses (% of 259 cases with secondary diagnosis coded).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Length of Stay in In-Reach Team Beds.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Seasonal Variation in Outcomes of Referral to In-Reach Team.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Royal Commission on Long Term Care With respect to old age: Long term care – rights and responsibilities London. 1999.
    1. Foresight Ageing Population Panel The age shift – Priorities for action London. 1999.
    1. Audit Commission Services for older people London. 2000.
    1. Audit Commission The way to go home: Rehabilitation and remedial services for older people London. 2000.
    1. Wanless D, Fernandez J, Poole T, Beesley L, Henwood M, Moscone F. Securing Good Care for Older People: Taking a long-term view London. 2006.

Publication types