Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2008 Sep;6 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):s4-11.
doi: 10.2450/2008.0030-08.

Primary prophylaxis in children with haemophilia

Affiliations
Review

Primary prophylaxis in children with haemophilia

Antonio Coppola et al. Blood Transfus. 2008 Sep.

Abstract

Starting from the clinical observations that moderate haemophiliacs experienced only few bleeding episodes and rarely developed significant joint deterioration (haemophilic arthropathy), and the pioneer experience in Sweden, prophylaxis (i.e. the regular and long-term administration of clotting factor concentrate in order to prevent bleeding) has been practiced for more than forty years in severe haemophilia and is currently recommended as the first choice of treatment by the World Health Organisation and World Federation of Hemophilia and by many national medical/scientific organizations. Observational studies clearly established the superiority of prophylaxis over on-demand treatment in reducing the risk of arthropathy, also showing that starting prophylaxis earlier in life and after very few joint bleeds was associated with better joint outcomes, and led to the current definitions of primary (started before the age of 2 yrs and after no more than one joint bleed) and secondary prophylaxis. More recently, evidences from randomized trials, which were previously lacking in this setting, were also provided. This review summarizes available data from which current clinical practice of primary (and early secondary) prophylaxis in children with severe haemophilia was drawn. Open issues concerning optimal regimens and barriers to the implementation of prophylaxis are also discussed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Choices of treatment regimens in haemophiliacs and the different ages at which they are implemented affect the patients clinical and psychosocial outcomes. From Ljung, modified.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Nilsson IM, Berntorp E, Löfqvist T, Pettersson H. Twenty-five years experience of prophylactic treatment in severe haemophilia A and B. J Intern Med. 1992;232:25–32. - PubMed
    1. Berntorp E, Boulyjenkov V, Brettler D, et al. Modern treatment of haemophilia. Bull World Health Organ. 1995;73:691–701. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ramgren O. Haemophilia in Sweden. III. Symptomatology, with special reference to differences between haemophilia A and B. Acta Med Scand. 1962;171:237–42. - PubMed
    1. Ahlberg A. Haemophilia in Sweden. VII. Incidence, treatment and prophylaxis of arthropathy and other musculo-skeletal manifestations of haemophilia A and B. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl. 1965;(Suppl 77):3–132. - PubMed
    1. Aledort L, Haschmeyer RH, Pettersson H. A longitudinal study of orthopaedic outcomes for severe factor-VIII-deficient haemophiliacs. The Orthopaedic Outcome Study Group. J Intern Med. 1994;236:391–9. - PubMed

MeSH terms