Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2009 Apr;93(4):497-501.
doi: 10.1136/bjo.2008.148510. Epub 2008 Dec 23.

Intraocular pressure control and fluctuation: the effect of treatment with selective laser trabeculoplasty

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Intraocular pressure control and fluctuation: the effect of treatment with selective laser trabeculoplasty

M Nagar et al. Br J Ophthalmol. 2009 Apr.

Abstract

Aims: To evaluate the effect of selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) on intraocular pressure (IOP) control and diurnal tension curves of patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) and ocular hypertension (OHT), and to compare this effect with that of latanoprost.

Methods: Forty patients were randomised to receive either SLT or latanoprost. IOP control was evaluated by comparing pretreatment values with post-treatment measurements on day 3, week 1, month 1 and 4-6 months; success was defined as 20% decrease in IOP. Tension curves were plotted prior to treatment and 4-6 months afterwards; success was 50% reduction in fluctuation.

Results: SLT decreased pressure by 4.7 mm Hg on average (95% CI 3.6 to 5.7 mm Hg; p<0.01). The reduction was similar for latanoprost at all follow-ups except month 1; 75% of SLT patients and 73% of latanoprost patients achieved success in IOP control (p = 0.4). SLT significantly reduced IOP fluctuation, but latanoprost was more effective (3.6 mm Hg, 95% CI 3.2 to 3.9 mm Hg vs 2.5 mm Hg, 95% CI 2.2 to 2.9 mm Hg for SLT; p = 0.04). Success in fluctuation reduction was 50% for SLT and 83% for latanoprost (p = 0.045).

Conclusions: Both SLT and latanoprost had a significant impact on IOP control and fluctuation. While latanoprost may be more likely to reduce IOP fluctuation, SLT has the benefit of being a one-time intervention not requiring ongoing patient compliance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

MeSH terms