Retrospective outcomes evaluation of 100 parenteral moderate and deep sedations conducted in a general practice dental residency
- PMID: 19108595
- PMCID: PMC2614649
- DOI: 10.2344/0003-3006-55.4.116
Retrospective outcomes evaluation of 100 parenteral moderate and deep sedations conducted in a general practice dental residency
Abstract
An abstract of this study was presented at the American Association for Dental Research (AADR) Dental Anesthesiology Research Group in Honolulu, Hawaii, in March of 2004. This study was conducted to correlate the intraoperative and postoperative morbidity associated with moderate and deep sedation, also known as monitored anesthesia care (MAC), provided in a General Practice Residency (GPR) clinic under the supervision of a dentist anesthesiologist. After internal review board approval was obtained, 100 parenteral moderate and deep sedation cases performed by the same dentist anesthesiologist in collaboration with second year GPR residents were randomly selected and reviewed by 2 independent evaluators. Eleven morbidity criteria were assessed and were correlated with patient age, gender, American Society of Anesthesiology Physical Status Classification (ASAPS), duration of procedure, and anesthetic protocol. A total of 39 males and 61 females were evaluated. Patients' ASAPS were classified as I, II, and III, with the average ASAPS of 1.61 and the standard deviation (STDEV) of 0.584. No ASPS IV or V was noted. Average patient age was 33.8 years (STDEV, 14.57), and the average duration of procedure was 97.5 minutes (STDEV, 42.39). Three incidents of postoperative nausea and vomiting were reported. All 3 incidents involved the ketamine-midazolam-propofol anesthetic combination. All patients were treated and were well controlled with ondansetron. One incident of tongue biting in an autistic child was regarded as an effect of local anesthesia. One patient demonstrated intermittent premature atrial contractions (PACs) intraoperatively but was stable. Moderate and deep sedation, also known as MAC, is safe and beneficial in an outpatient GPR setting with proper personnel and monitoring. This study did not demonstrate a correlation between length of procedure and morbidity. Ketamine was associated with all reported nausea and vomiting incidents because propofol and midazolam are rarely associated with such events.
Similar articles
-
An outcome study comparing intravenous sedation with midazolam/fentanyl (conscious sedation) versus propofol infusion (deep sedation) for aesthetic surgery.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003 Nov;112(6):1683-9; discussion 1690-1. doi: 10.1097/01.PRS.0000086363.34535.A4. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003. PMID: 14578803
-
Safety of intravenous sedation administered by the operating oral surgeon: the second 7 years of office practice.J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011 Oct;69(10):2525-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2011.02.030. Epub 2011 Jul 2. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011. PMID: 21724314
-
Procedural sedation with propofol for painful orthopaedic manipulation in the emergency department expedites patient management compared with a midazolam/ketamine regimen: a randomized prospective study.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Dec 21;93(24):2255-62. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.J.01307. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011. PMID: 22258771 Clinical Trial.
-
Overview of pharmacological aspects of sedation--Part I.SADJ. 2000 Jul;55(7):387-9. SADJ. 2000. PMID: 12608198 Review. No abstract available.
-
Safe and effective procedural sedation for gastrointestinal endoscopy in children.J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2012 Feb;54(2):171-85. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0b013e31823a2985. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2012. PMID: 21975965 Review.
Cited by
-
Practice Guidelines for Intravenous Conscious Sedation in Dentistry (Second Edition, 2017).Anesth Prog. 2018 Winter;65(4):e1-e18. doi: 10.2344/anpr-65-04-15w. Anesth Prog. 2018. PMID: 30702348 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Risk factors with intravenous sedation for patients with disabilities.Anesth Prog. 2013 Winter;60(4):153-61. doi: 10.2344/0003-3006-60.4.153. Anesth Prog. 2013. PMID: 24423418 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Dionne R.A, Gordon S.M, McCullagh L.M, Phero J.C. Assessing the need for general anesthesia and sedation in the general population. J Am Dent Assoc. 1998;129:167–173. - PubMed
-
- Gordon S.M, Dionne R.A, Snyder J. Dental fear and anxiety as a barrier to accessing oral health care among patients with special health care needs. Spec Care Dentist. 1998;18:88–92. - PubMed
-
- Boynes S.G, Lemak A.L, Close J.M. General dentists' evaluation of anesthesia sedation education in US dental schools. J Dent Educ. 2006;70:1289–1293. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources