Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008:52.
doi: 10.3402/fnr.v52i0.1811. Epub 2008 Aug 18.

Plant sterols/stanols as cholesterol lowering agents: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Affiliations

Plant sterols/stanols as cholesterol lowering agents: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Suhad S Abumweis et al. Food Nutr Res. 2008.

Abstract

Background: Consumption of plant sterols has been reported to reduce low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol concentrations by 5-15%. Factors that affect plant sterol efficacy are still to be determined.

Objectives: To more precisely quantify the effect of plant sterol enriched products on LDL cholesterol concentrations than what is reported previously, and to identify and quantify the effects of subjects' characteristics, food carrier, frequency and time of intake on efficacy of plant sterols as cholesterol lowering agents.

Design: Fifty-nine eligible randomized clinical trials published from 1992 to 2006 were identified from five databases. Weighted mean effect sizes were calculated for net differences in LDL levels using a random effect model.

Results: Plant sterol containing products decreased LDL levels by 0.31 mmol/L (95% CI, -0.35 to -0.27, P= < 0.0001) compared with placebo. Between trial heterogeneity was evident (Chi-square test, P = <0.0001) indicating that the observed differences between trial results were unlikely to have been caused by chance. Reductions in LDL levels were greater in individuals with high baseline LDL levels compared with those with normal to borderline baseline LDL levels. Reductions in LDL were greater when plant sterols were incorporated into fat spreads, mayonnaise and salad dressing, milk and yoghurt comparing with other food products such as croissants and muffins, orange juice, non-fat beverages, cereal bars, and chocolate. Plant sterols consumed as a single morning dose did not have a significant effect on LDL cholesterol levels.

Conclusion: Plant sterol containing products reduced LDL concentrations but the reduction was related to individuals' baseline LDL levels, food carrier, and frequency and time of intake.

Keywords: LDL cholesterol; food carrier; intake frequency; meta-analysis; plant sterols; single dose.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig 1.
Fig 1.
Selection of randomized placebo controlled studies for meta-analysis of plant sterols and circulating cholesterol levels.
Fig 2.
Fig 2.
Effect size and 95% CI in LDL cholesterol levels associated with consumption of plant sterol/stanol containing food products.
Fig 3.
Fig 3.
Funnel plots of SE versus effect size for LDL cholesterol levels.

References

    1. National Cholesterol Education Program Expert Panel. Third report of the national cholesterol education program (NCEP) expert panel on detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (adult treatment panel III) final report. Circulation. 2002;106:3143–421. - PubMed
    1. Fletcher B, Berra K, Ades P, Braun LT, Burke LE, Durstine JL, Fair JM, Fletcher GF, Goff D, et al. Managing abnormal blood lipids – A collaborative approach. Circulation. 2005;112:3184–209. - PubMed
    1. Berger A, Jones PJ, Abumweis SS. Plant sterols: factors affecting their efficacy and safety as functional food ingredients. Lipids Health Dis. 2004;3:5. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Law M. Plant sterol and stanol margarines and health. Br Med J. 2000;320:861–4. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Katan MB, Grundy SM, Jones P, Law M, Miettinen T, Paoletti R. Efficacy and safety of plant stanols and sterols in the management of blood cholesterol levels. Mayo Clin Proc. 2003;78:965–78. - PubMed