Patient-physician communication: informed consent for imaging-guided spinal injections
- PMID: 19111270
- PMCID: PMC2742225
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2008.08.004
Patient-physician communication: informed consent for imaging-guided spinal injections
Abstract
Purpose: Historically, informed-consent forms have been developed for the purpose of educating patients. However, informed-consent forms can be very difficult to understand. The hypothesis of this study was that a method using diagrams would improve patient-physician communication without increasing the time required to obtain informed consent over the teach-the-teacher method, as well as over current standard informed-consent protocol.
Methods: Ninety-nine of 109 patients undergoing spinal injections agreed to participate and completed this prospective, randomized, controlled study. The patients were randomly assigned to the control group (informed consent obtained in the customary manner at the investigators' institution, with 12 key points of consent and home care discussed conversationally), the teach-the-teacher group (patients had to repeat the 12 key points to the physicians before informed consent was complete), and the diagram group (patients viewed a set of diagrams illustrating the 12 key points before signing the informed-consent form). After the procedure, the patients completed a survey to test knowledge recall, anxiety, and pain during the procedure.
Results: Statistically significant results included a lower survey score for the control group, longer time required for the teach-the-teacher group than the control group, and a negative correlation between age and survey score in the teach-the-teacher group.
Conclusions: The diagram method required less time than the teach-the-teacher method, had no negative correlation in survey score results with age, and had improved patient-physician communication over the control group.
Figures






References
-
- Hopper KD, TenHave TR, Hartzel J. Informed consent forms for clinical and research imaging procedures: how much do patients understand? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995;164:493–96. - PubMed
-
- Kutner M, Greenberg E, Jin Y, Paulsen C. Executive summary. The health literacy of America’s adults: results from the 2003 national assessment of adult literacy (NCES 2006-483) In: Kutner M, Greenberg E, Jin Y, Paulsen C, editors. US Department of Education. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics; 2006. pp. iii–v.
-
- Committee on Quality of Health Care in America, Institute of Medicine. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2001. Executive summary; pp. 1–22.
-
- White CS, Mason AC, Feehan M, Templeton PA. Informed consent for percutaneous lung biopsy: comparison of two consent protocols based on patient recall after the procedure. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995;165:1139–1142. - PubMed
-
- Delp C, Jones J. Communicating information to patients: the use of cartoon illustrations to improve comprehension of instructions. Acad Emerg Med. 1996;3:264–270. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical