Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1991 Apr-Jun;10(2):127-36.

Instrumental (operative) vaginal deliveries: vacuum extraction compared with forceps delivery at Ilorin University Teaching Hospital, Nigeria

Affiliations
  • PMID: 1911480
Comparative Study

Instrumental (operative) vaginal deliveries: vacuum extraction compared with forceps delivery at Ilorin University Teaching Hospital, Nigeria

M Anate. West Afr J Med. 1991 Apr-Jun.

Abstract

In a four-year period (1984 to 1987) a total of 141 Nigerian women who had instrumental vaginal deliveries at term in the Obstetric unit of University of Ilorin Teaching Hospital, Ilorin, were studied. Out of this number 79 had forceps delivery while 62 had vacuum extraction. The forceps delivery rate had fluctuated between 0.11% and 0.46% while the vacuum extraction rate had steadily increased from 0.08% to 0.39% (Table 1) in our unit over the 4-year period. With the exception of fetal distress, there were no significant differences found in the indications for forceps delivery and vacuum extraction. The preapplication station, position and cervical dilatation differ in both groups (Table 4). There was less maternal trauma in vacuum extraction than forceps (Table 5). The vacuum extraction was more associated with cephalhaematoma and neonatal jaundice but less with neonatal mortality compared with forceps (Table 7). Vacuum extraction had gradually assumed more prominence as an alternative to midforceps delivery in our unit in the study period. There was no maternal mortality in the two groups.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

MeSH terms