HIV monotherapy with ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitors: a systematic review
- PMID: 19114854
- DOI: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e32831c54e5
HIV monotherapy with ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitors: a systematic review
Abstract
Objective: To assess the efficacy of ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor monotherapy.
Design and methods: Systematic review of all protease inhibitor-monotherapy studies published in peer-reviewed journals or presented at conferences to date. Data of randomized controlled trials were pooled to yield common odds ratios.
Results: Twenty-two protease inhibitor-monotherapy studies were identified. In the intent-to-treat analysis, 395 out of 582 (67.9%) patients had undetectable HIV-RNA at the end of follow-up. In the six randomized controlled trials (all lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy), the risk of therapy failure was greater on monotherapy: 121 out of 364 (33.2%) patients on monotherapy against 64 out of 280 (22.9%) patients on HAART [pooled odds ratio 1.48 (95% confidence interval 1.02-2.13, P = 0.037)]. Regarding patients with successfully resuppressed HIV-RNA upon (re-)introducing nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) as nonfailures, the risk of therapy failure was comparable: 98 out of 364 (26.9%) against 64 out of 280 (22.9%) patients [odds ratio 1.05 (95% confidence interval 0.72-1.53, P = 0.81)].
Conclusion: The overall efficacy of ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor monotherapy is inferior to HAART. The efficacy improves in patients started on monotherapy after suppressed HIV-RNA for at least 6 months. Ten percent of patients have viral rebound with HIV-RNA levels between 50 and 500 copies/ml. Possible explanations are lack of HIV suppression in particular cells or compartments, alternative resistance mechanisms, and nonadherence. Once proven that reintroduction of NRTIs, in patients with loss of viral suppression, is safe and effective, a broader use of simplification of HAART to protease inhibitor monotherapy might be justified. This review supports that the majority of patients with prolonged viral suppression on HAART can successfully be treated with protease inhibitor monotherapy. Arguments for this strategy are NRTI/NNRTI side effects, NRTI/NNRTI resistance, and costs.
Comment on
-
Ritonavir boosted indinavir treatment as a simplified maintenance "mono"-therapy for HIV infection.AIDS. 2004 Apr 9;18(6):955-7. doi: 10.1097/00002030-200404090-00017. AIDS. 2004. PMID: 15060447 No abstract available.
-
Lopinavir/ritonavir maintenance monotherapy after successful viral suppression with standard highly active antiretroviral therapy in HIV-1-infected patients.AIDS. 2005 Mar 4;19(4):447-9. doi: 10.1097/01.aids.0000161777.38438.ed. AIDS. 2005. PMID: 15750401 No abstract available.
-
Efficacy of boosted protease inhibitor monotherapy in patients with complex medical problems.AIDS. 2007 Aug 20;21(13):1821-3. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e328270389b. AIDS. 2007. PMID: 17690584 Clinical Trial.
-
Lopinavir-ritonavir monotherapy versus lopinavir-ritonavir and two nucleosides for maintenance therapy of HIV.AIDS. 2008 Jan 11;22(2):F1-9. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e3282f4243b. AIDS. 2008. PMID: 18097218 Clinical Trial.
-
Lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy or plus zidovudine and lamivudine in antiretroviral-naive HIV-infected patients.AIDS. 2008 Jan 30;22(3):385-93. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e3282f3f16d. AIDS. 2008. PMID: 18195565 Clinical Trial.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
