Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008;3(12):e4071.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004071. Epub 2008 Dec 30.

A survey of honey bee colony losses in the U.S., fall 2007 to spring 2008

Affiliations

A survey of honey bee colony losses in the U.S., fall 2007 to spring 2008

Dennis van Engelsdorp et al. PLoS One. 2008.

Abstract

Background: Honey bees are an essential component of modern agriculture. A recently recognized ailment, Colony Collapse Disorder (CCD), devastates colonies, leaving hives with a complete lack of bees, dead or alive. Up to now, estimates of honey bee population decline have not included losses occurring during the wintering period, thus underestimating actual colony mortality. Our survey quantifies the extent of colony losses in the United States over the winter of 2007-2008.

Methodology/principal findings: Surveys were conducted to quantify and identify management factors (e.g. operation size, hive migration) that contribute to high colony losses in general and CCD symptoms in particular. Over 19% of the country's estimated 2.44 million colonies were surveyed. A total loss of 35.8% of colonies was recorded; an increase of 11.4% compared to last year. Operations that pollinated almonds lost, on average, the same number of colonies as those that did not. The 37.9% of operations that reported having at least some of their colonies die with a complete lack of bees had a total loss of 40.8% of colonies compared to the 17.1% loss reported by beekeepers without this symptom. Large operations were more likely to have this symptom suggesting that a contagious condition may be a causal factor. Sixty percent of all colonies that were reported dead in this survey died without dead bees, and thus possibly suffered from CCD. In PA, losses varied with region, indicating that ambient temperature over winter may be an important factor.

Conclusions/significance: Of utmost importance to understanding the recent losses and CCD is keeping track of losses over time and on a large geographic scale. Given that our surveys are representative of the losses across all beekeeping operations, between 0.75 and 1.00 million honey bee colonies are estimated to have died in the United States over the winter of 2007-2008. This article is an extensive survey of U.S. beekeepers across the continent, serving as a reference for comparison with future losses as well as providing guidance to future hypothesis-driven research on the causes of colony mortality.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Total colony loss (%) by state.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Correlation of colony losses reported in the e-mail survey in PA with average ambient temperature between September 2007 and March 2008.

References

    1. Morse RA, Calderone NW. The value of honey bees as pollinators of U.S. crops in 2000. Bee Culture. 2000;128:1–15.
    1. Gallai N, Salles J-M, Settele J, Vassiére BE. Economic valuation of the vulnerability of world agriculture confronted with pollinator decline. Ecol Econ. 2008 In press.
    1. Klein AM, Vassiére BE, Cane JH, Steffan-Dewenter I, Cunningham SA, et al. Importance of pollinators in changing landscapes for world crops. Proc Roy Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2007;274:303–313. - PMC - PubMed
    1. National Research Council. Status of pollinators in North America. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2006. p. 322.
    1. Free JB. Insect pollination of crops. London: Academic Press; 1993. p. 768.

Publication types