Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Jan;123(1):87-93.
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181954036.

Refinements in nasal reconstruction: the cross-paramedian forehead flap

Affiliations

Refinements in nasal reconstruction: the cross-paramedian forehead flap

Jeff Angobaldo et al. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009 Jan.

Abstract

Background: Nasal reconstruction can be a challenge for the plastic surgeon. The forehead flap is the workhorse in nasal reconstruction, providing similar skin color, texture, structure, and reliability. There are disadvantages of the forehead flap, including a difficult arc of rotation, which risks displacement of medial eyebrow hair. The vertical design can encroach on the scalp, incorporating hair into the nasal reconstruction. Forehead flap inset results in an inverted V-shaped scar visible in the glabella region. This article describes the authors' modification of the established oblique paramedian forehead flap.

Methods: This retrospective study included a consecutive series of patients over an 11-year period (December of 1996 to December of 2007) that underwent nasal reconstruction performed by the primary surgeon (J.A.). Information obtained from chart reviews included age, sex, cause of nasal defect, complications, and revisions.

Results: This study population consisted of 94 adults: 54 men (57 percent) and 40 women (43 percent) who underwent nasal reconstruction using the cross-paramedian forehead flap. All flaps were performed for skin cancer reconstruction. Partial flap loss was the most common complication. Tobacco use was associated with half of the complications. Further refinements following forehead flap inset were performed in 50 percent of patients.

Conclusions: The cross-paramedian forehead flap is a useful design when planning subtotal nasal reconstruction. It provides a smooth arc of rotation and increased length, avoids an inverted V-shaped glabella scar, and minimizes eyebrow distortion. These modifications of the forehead flap maintain the reliability and versatility of the flap and provide an aesthetically pleasing result.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Yoon T, Benito-Ruiz J, Garcia DE, Serra-Renom JM. Our algorithm for nasal reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2006;59:239–247.
    1. Sushruta Samita (circa 600 BC). Translated from the Sanskrit. Calcutta: KKL Bhishagratna, 1907.
    1. McDowell F. The Source Book of Plastic Surgery. Baltimore: Waverly Press, 1977.
    1. McDowell F. Commentary and adjuvants. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1969;48:71–73.
    1. Patterson T. “Mr. Lucas” and the “B.L.” letter (Letter). Plast Reconstr Surg. 1971;48:68–71.

LinkOut - more resources