Three tenets for staged correction of Kleeblattschädel or cloverleaf skull deformity
- PMID: 19116567
- DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181934773
Three tenets for staged correction of Kleeblattschädel or cloverleaf skull deformity
Abstract
Background: Patients with cloverleaf skull deformity are known to have high morbidity and poor outcome. Physical anomalies include a misshapen, trilobar skull, with a high "bossed" forehead, a bulging temporal region, and a flat posterior skull from multiple cranial suture fusion.
Methods: Patients with cloverleaf skull deformity treated at the University of California, Los Angeles from 1990 to 2006 (n = 14) underwent early cranial vault remodeling (group 1) or staged correction with ventriculoperitoneal shunt (neonate), fronto-orbital advancement (3 to 6 months), and posterior vault remodeling (1 year) (group 2). Morbidity, necessary revisions, and neurologic (developmental testing) and aesthetic (Whitaker score) outcomes were assessed at follow-up.
Results: Diagnoses included Apert syndrome, Crouzon syndrome, Pfeiffer syndrome, Saethre-Chotzen syndrome, and nonsyndromic. Early cranial vault remodeling patients had more complications than staged correction patients [pneumonia, meningitis, and excessive bleeding (each 66 percent versus 9 percent); wound infection (66 percent versus 18 percent); and seizure (100 percent versus 0 percent)]. Early cranial vault remodeling patients had prolonged intensive care unit and hospital stays compared with staged correction patients (13 versus 2 days and 27 versus 5 days, respectively). The Whitaker score showed acceptable results at 18 months in group 2 (1.4, no revisions necessary) but not in group 1 (2.8, minor to major bony recontouring). Developmental tests showed that all early cranial vault remodeling patients had lower scores in both preschool tests and global evaluations compared with normative data (mean preschool receptive scores, 95 versus 85; mean preschool expressive scores, 94 versus 87).
Conclusion: Staged correction of cloverleaf skull provided acceptable neurologic and aesthetic outcomes in the authors' series of patients.
References
-
- van der Meulen J, Mazzola M, Strickler M, Raphael B. Classification of craniofacial malformations. In Strickler M, Van der Meulen J, Mazzola M, eds. Craniofacial Malformations. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1990:258–269.
-
- Shiroyama Y, Ito H, Yamashita T, Nakano S, Kurokawa Y. The relationship of cloverleaf skull syndrome to hydrocephalus. Childs Nerv Syst. 1991;7:382–385.
-
- Zuccaro G, Dogliotti P, Bennum R, Monges J. Treatment of cloverleaf skull syndrome. Childs Nerv Syst. 1996;12:695–698.
-
- Goh KY, Ahuja A, Fok TF, Poon WS. Cloverleaf skull: When should one operate? Singapore Med J. 1997;38:217–220.
-
- Resnick DK, Pollack IF, Albright AL. Surgical management of the cloverleaf skull deformity. Pediatr Neurosurg. 1995;22:29–37.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
