Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008;16(1):e1-8.
doi: 10.1179/jmt.2008.16.1.1E.

Inclusion of Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy (MDT) in the Management of Cervical Radiculopathy: A Case Report

Ronald Schenk  1 , Talisha Bhaidani, Boswell Melissa, James Kelley, Timothy Kruchowsky
Affiliations

Inclusion of Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy (MDT) in the Management of Cervical Radiculopathy: A Case Report

Ronald Schenk et al. J Man Manip Ther. 2008.

Abstract

Various interventions are used by physical therapists to treat neck conditions. Treatments may include exercises based on a direction of preference, cervical spine stabilization, neuromobilization, or traction. The purpose of this case study was to describe the use of mechanical diagnosis and therapy (MDT) in the management of a patient diagnosed with cervical radiculopathy. The case study involved a 39-year-old male (subject), classified with cervical derangement, hypermobility, and adverse neural tension. The subject's intervention included MDT, deep neck flexor muscle strengthening, and neuromobilization. This subject's scores on the Neck Disability Index, Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), and range of motion were assessed at initial examination, discharge, and 3-month follow-up. The subject improved on all outcome measures and was discharged after four visits with a NPRS of 0/10. Percent improvement per visit was 17.5%. This case describes a positive outcome for a patient diagnosed with cervical radiculopathy in which MDT, deep neck flexor strengthening, and neuromobilization were used as an alternative to cervical traction.

Keywords: Cervical Spine Stabilization; Direction of Preference; Exercise; Traction.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Cote P, Cassidy D, Carroll L. The Saskatchewan health and back pain survey: The prevalence of neck pain and related disability in Saskatchewan adults. Spine. 1998;23:1689–1697. - PubMed
    1. Childs J, Fritz J, Piva S, Whitman J. Proposal of classification system for patients with neck pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2001;34:686–700. - PubMed
    1. Lee H, Nicholson L, Adams R. Neck muscle endurance, self-report, and range of motion data from subjects with treated and untreated neck pain. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2005;28:25–32. - PubMed
    1. Hoving J, Gross A, Gasner D, et al. A critical appraisal of review articles on the effectiveness of conservative treatment for neck pain. Spine. 2001;26:196–205. - PubMed
    1. Daffner S, Hilibrand A, Hanscom B, Brislin B, Vaccaro A, Albert T. Impact of neck and arm pain on overall health status. Spine. 2003;28:2030–2035. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources