Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008;12(4):159-168.
doi: 10.1016/j.appsy.2008.05.002.

Actions speak louder than words: An elaborated theoretical model of the social functions of self-injury and other harmful behaviors

Affiliations

Actions speak louder than words: An elaborated theoretical model of the social functions of self-injury and other harmful behaviors

Matthew K Nock. Appl Prev Psychol. 2008.

Abstract

The question of why some people do things that are intentionally harmful to themselves continues to puzzle scientists, clinicians, and the public. Prior studies have demonstrated that one fairly extreme, direct form of self-harm, non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI), is maintained by both automatic (i.e., intrapersonal) as well as social (i.e., interpersonal) reinforcement. However, the majority of theoretical and empirical papers on this topic focus almost exclusively on the automatic functions. The purpose of this paper is to provide a more comprehensive analysis of the social functions of NSSI. Evidence is presented supporting the notion that NSSI is maintained by social reinforcement in at least a substantial minority of instances. Moreover, an elaborated theoretical model of the social functions of NSSI is outlined that proposes that this behavior represents a high intensity social signal used when less intense communication strategies fail (e.g., speaking, yelling, crying). The model further proposes that NSSI can serve not only as a signal of distress that is reinforced primarily by the caregiving behavior it elicits from others, but that it also can serve as a signal of strength and fitness that is reinforced by warding off potential threats (e.g., peer victimization), and in some cases can strengthen affiliation with others. Support for this theoretical model is drawn from diverse literatures including psychology, evolutionary biology, and cultural anthropology. The paper concludes with specific recommendations for empirical tests of the proposed model of the social functions of NSSI, as well as other harmful behaviors such as alcohol and drug use.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Schematic of how communication intensity and mode can escalate to NSSI
Figure 2
Figure 2. Proposed functions of self-injurious behaviors
Note: NSSI = Non-suicidal self-injury; APR = automatic positive reinforcement; ANR = automatic negative reinforcement; SPR = social negative reinforcement; SPR = social positive reinforcement.

References

    1. APA. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 1994.
    1. Barlow DH, Nock MK, Hersen M. Single case experimental designs: Strategies for studying behavior change (3rd edition) Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon; in press.
    1. Baumeister RF, Vohs KD, Funder DC. Psychology as the science of self-reports and finger movements: What ever happened to actual behavior? Perspectives of Psychological Science. 2007;2(4):396–403. - PubMed
    1. Blumberg MS, Sokoloff G. Do infant rats cry? Psychological Review. 2001;108(1):83–95. - PubMed
    1. Brockman B. Food refusal in prisoners: a communication or a method of self-killing? The role of the psychiatrist and resulting ethical challenges. Journal of Medical Ethics. 1999;25(6):451–456. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources