Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Jan;18(1):255-9.
doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-0704.

Common genetic variation in candidate genes and susceptibility to subtypes of breast cancer

Affiliations

Common genetic variation in candidate genes and susceptibility to subtypes of breast cancer

Nasim Mavaddat et al. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009 Jan.

Abstract

Association studies have been widely used to search for common low-penetrance susceptibility alleles to breast cancer in general. However, breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease and it has been suggested that it may be possible to identify additional susceptibility alleles by restricting analyses to particular subtypes. We used data on 710 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) in 120 candidate genes from a large candidate gene association study of up to 4,470 cases and 4,560 controls to compare the results of analyses of "overall" breast cancer with subgroup analyses based on the major clinicopathologic characteristics of breast cancer (stage, grade, morphology, and hormone receptor status). No SNP was highly significant in overall effects analysis. Subgroup analysis resulted in substantial reordering of ranks of SNPs, as assessed by the magnitude of the test statistics, and some associations that were not significant for an overall effect were detected in subgroups at a nominal 5% level adjusted for multiple testing. The most significant association of CCND1 SNP rs3212879 with estrogen receptor-negative tumor types (P = 0.001) did not reach genome-wide significance levels. These results show that it may be possible to detect associations using subgroup analysis that are missed in overall effects analysis. If the associations we found can be replicated in independent studies, they may provide important insights into disease mechanisms in breast cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Q-Q plot for association of SNPs with breast cancer, observed vs expected Chi-quared χ2: overall effects (A), grade (B), stage (C), lobular morphology (D), and ductal morphology (E), ER positive (F), ER negative (G), PR positive (H), and PR negative breast cancers (I). The line shows the plot of expected values according to the null hypothesis.

References

    1. Familial breast cancer: collaborative reanalysis of individual data from 52 epidemiological studies including 58,209 women with breast cancer and 101,986 women without the disease. Lancet. 2001;358:1389–1399. - PubMed
    1. Easton DF. How many more breast cancer predisposition genes are there? Breast Cancer Res. 1999;1:14–17. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Antoniou AC, Pharoah PD, McMullan G, et al. A comprehensive model for familial breast cancer incorporating BRCA1, BRCA2 and other genes. Br J Cancer. 2002;86:76–83. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Antoniou AC, Pharoah PP, Smith P, et al. The BOADICEA model of genetic susceptibility to breast and ovarian cancer. Br J Cancer. 2004;91:1580–1590. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cui J, Antoniou AC, Dite GS, et al. After BRCA1 and BRCA2-what next? Multifactorial segregation analyses of three-generation, population-based Australian families affected by female breast cancer. Am J Hum Genet. 2001;68:420–431. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types