Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009;4(1):e4049.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004049. Epub 2009 Jan 6.

Will patients benefit from regionalization of gynecologic cancer care?

Affiliations

Will patients benefit from regionalization of gynecologic cancer care?

Kathleen F Brookfield et al. PLoS One. 2009.

Abstract

Objective: Patient chances for cure and palliation for a variety of malignancies may be greatly affected by the care provided by a treating hospital. We sought to determine the effect of volume and teaching status on patient outcomes for five gynecologic malignancies: endometrial, cervical, ovarian and vulvar carcinoma and uterine sarcoma.

Methods: The Florida Cancer Data System dataset was queried for all patients undergoing treatment for gynecologic cancers from 1990-2000.

Results: Overall, 48,981 patients with gynecologic malignancies were identified. Endometrial tumors were the most common, representing 43.2% of the entire cohort, followed by ovarian cancer (30.9%), cervical cancer (20.8%), vulvar cancer (4.6%), and uterine sarcoma (0.5%). By univariate analysis, although patients treated at high volume centers (HVC) were significantly younger, they benefited from an improved short-term (30-day and/or 90-day) survival for cervical, ovarian and endometrial cancers. Multivariate analysis (MVA), however, failed to demonstrate significant survival benefit for gynecologic cancer patients treated at teaching facilities (TF) or HVC. Significant prognostic factors at presentation by MVA were age over 65 (HR = 2.6, p<0.01), African-American race (HR = 1.36, p<0.01), and advanced stage (regional HR = 2.08, p<0.01; advanced HR = 3.82, p<0.01, respectively). Surgery and use of chemotherapy were each significantly associated with improved survival.

Conclusion: No difference in patient survival was observed for any gynecologic malignancy based upon treating hospital teaching or volume status. Although instances of improved outcomes may occur, overall further regionalization would not appear to significantly improve patient survival.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Flow diagram depicting number of incident gynecologic malignancies diagnosed in the state of Florida from 1990–2000.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Kaplan-Meier survival curves comparing cumulative survival at teaching facilities (TF) and non-teaching facilities (NTF) for (a) cervical cancer, (b) ovarian cancer, (c) endometrial cancer, (d) uterine sarcoma, and (e) vulvar cancer and at high-volume centers (HVC), intermediate-volume centers (IVC), and low-volume centers (LVC) for (f) cervical cancer, (g) ovarian cancer, (h) endometrial cancer, (i) uterine sarcoma, and (j) vulvar cancer.

References

    1. Bristow RE, Zahurak ML, del Carmen MG, Gordon TA, Fox HE, et al. Ovarian cancer surgery in Maryland: volume-based access to care. Gynecol Oncol. 2004;93:353–360. - PubMed
    1. Carney ME, Lancaster JM, Ford C, Tsodikov A, Wiggins CL. A population-based study of patterns of care for ovarian cancer: who is seen by a gynecologic oncologist and who is not? Gynecol Oncol. 2002;84:36–42. - PubMed
    1. Earle CC, Schrag D, Neville BA, Yabroff KR, Topor M, et al. Effect of surgeon specialty on processes of care and outcomes for ovarian cancer patients. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006;98:172–180. - PubMed
    1. Eisenkop SM, Spirtos NM, Montag TW, Nalick RH, Wang HJ. The impact of subspecialty training on the management of advanced ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 1992;47:203–209. - PubMed
    1. Hillner BE, Smith TJ, Desch CE. Hospital and physician volume or specialization and outcomes in cancer treatment: importance in quality of cancer care. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18:2327–2340. - PubMed