Pain outcomes: a brief review of instruments and techniques
- PMID: 19126370
- PMCID: PMC2891384
- DOI: 10.1007/s11916-009-0009-x
Pain outcomes: a brief review of instruments and techniques
Abstract
Pain is a difficult outcome to measure due to its multifaceted and subjective nature. The need for selecting proper outcome measures is high because of the increasing demand for scientifically valid demonstrations of treatment efficacy. This article discusses some basic topics in the measurement of pain outcomes and addresses issues such as statistical versus clinical significance, daily home data collection, appropriate length of outcome measurement packets, and the possibility of objective pain measurements. This article also reviews some of the more commonly used tools for measuring pain and pain-related disability. By selecting the proper tools and employing them correctly, we can obtain highly reliable and valid measures of pain outcomes in research and clinical care.
References
-
- Turk DC, Melzack R. Handbook of Pain Assessment. Guilford Press; New York: 2001.
-
- Todd KH. Clinical versus statistical significance in the assessment of pain relief. Ann Emerg Med. 1996;27:439–441. - PubMed
-
- Farrar JT, Young JP, LaMoreaux L, et al. Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale. Pain. 2001;94:149–158. - PubMed
-
- Farrar JT, Berlin JA, Strom BL. Clinically important changes in acute pain outcome measures: a validation study. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2003;25:406–411. - PubMed
-
-
Kvien TK, Heiberg T, Hagen KB. Minimal clinically important improvement/difference (MCII/MCID) and patient acceptable symptom state (PASS): what do these concepts mean? Ann Rheum Dis. 2007;66(Suppl 3):iii40–iii41. Provides guidelines for empirically setting clinically significant outcome measure cutoffs.
-
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical