Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Nov 12:2:5.
doi: 10.3389/neuro.05.005.2008. eCollection 2008.

Is 21st century neuroscience too focussed on the rat/mouse model of brain function and dysfunction?

Affiliations

Is 21st century neuroscience too focussed on the rat/mouse model of brain function and dysfunction?

Paul R Manger et al. Front Neuroanat. .

Abstract

Studies in the basic neurosciences are heavily reliant upon rat and mouse models. The brain is one of the most distinguishing features of the human species, but is enough being done to fully understand the evolution of the human brain and brain diversity in general? Without a clear understanding of the evolution of the nervous system we may be investing a great deal of effort into some limited specific animal models that may prove to be erroneous in terms of the overall usefulness in clinically applied research. Here we present an analysis that demonstrates that 75% of our research efforts are directed to the rat, mouse and human brain, or 0.0001% of the nervous systems on the planet. This extreme bias in research trends may provide a limited scope in the discovery of novel aspects of brain structure and function that would be of importance in understanding both the evolution of the human brain and in selecting appropriate animal models for use in clinically related research. We offer examples both from the historical and recent literature indicating the usefulness of comparative neurobiological investigation in elucidating both normal and abnormal structure and function of the brain.

Keywords: animal models; central nervous system; evolution; invertebrate; vertebrate.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Bar graphs representing the percentage of published pages devoted to each of the phylogenetic groupings classified in the present study for the period 2000–2004 in the general neuroscience group and in each of the two comparative journals. Note the similarity of The Journal of Comparative Neurology to the general neuroscience journals, and the emphasis of the under-represented groups in Brain, Behavior and Evolution.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Bar graphs representing the percentage of published pages devoted to each of the phylogenetic groupings classified in the present study in 5-year blocks for the period 1975–2004 in each of the two comparative journals. Specific trends in the animal species studied can be seen in these plots.

References

    1. Blinkov S. M., Glezer I. I. (1968). The Human Brain in Figures and Tables. A Quantitative Handbook. New York, Plenum Press.
    1. Bueker E. D. (1948). Implantation of tumors in the hind limb field of the embryonic chick and the developmental response of the lumbosacral nervous system. Anat. Rec. 102, 369–39010.1002/ar.1091020309 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bullock T. H. (1984). Comparative neuroscience holds promise for quiet revolutions. Science 225, 473–47810.1126/science.6740319 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bullock T. H. (1993). How are more complex brain different? One view and an agenda for comparative neurobiology. Brain Behav. Evol. 41, 88–9610.1159/000113826 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cajal S. R. (1888). Estructura de los centros nerviosos de las aves. Rev. Trimest. Histol. Norm. Patol. (Barcelona) 1, 1–10

LinkOut - more resources