Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1991 Aug 24;303(6800):447-50.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.303.6800.447.

Cervical screening in Perth and Kinross since introduction of the new contract

Affiliations

Cervical screening in Perth and Kinross since introduction of the new contract

G S Reid et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objective: To determine changes in the cervical screening service since the introduction of the new general practitioner contract on 1 April 1990.

Design: Analysis of computerised records of cervical screening both before and after introduction of the new contract.

Setting: General practices in Perth and Kinross Unit, Tayside.

Patients: A total of 30,071 women aged 21-60 on 26 general practitioner partnership lists.

Main outcome measures: Percentage average of target population for cervical screening in each practice for first three quarters on introduction of the contract.

Results: Perth and Kinross Unit completed a computerised cervical screening call programme in July 1989, which produced an increase from 71% to 78% in the mean percentage of women aged 20-60 who had had cervical smear tests within 5.5 years. Six months after the introduction of the new general practitioner contract the mean population coverage was increased to 85% in women aged 21-60 and only four practices had not attained the 80% upper target compared with 10 on 1 April 1990. Detailed examination of randomly selected practices immediately before the new contract was introduced showed an average artificial list inflation of 4.3% in health board records when compared with practice records, a hysterectomy rate of 6.2%, and an additional 3% of women who were considered to be ineligible for smear testing due to putative virginity or illness or infirmity, or both. There was a considerable shift away from use of well woman clinics (2.7% of smears in 1990 compared with 5.6% in 1988) for taking cervical smears, potentially threatening the long term viability of the clinics.

Conclusion: The introduction of the new contract for general practitioners has brought about a further sustained increase in population coverage for cervical screening in a small Scottish unit with a stable population, well motivated general practitioners, and a fully integrated computerised call and recall system based on the community health index. To optimise the screening service revision of the targets levels is necessary.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. Cytopathology. 1990;1(1):3-12 - PubMed
    1. BMJ. 1988 Nov 19;297(6659):1317-8 - PubMed
    1. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1984 Oct 6;289(6449):853-4 - PubMed
    1. BMJ. 1990 Jun 9;300(6738):1504-6 - PubMed
    1. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1990 Jan;97(1):58-61 - PubMed