Trust but verify: the interactive effects of trust and autonomy preferences on health outcomes
- PMID: 19130247
- DOI: 10.1007/s10728-008-0100-1
Trust but verify: the interactive effects of trust and autonomy preferences on health outcomes
Abstract
Patients' trust in their physicians improves their health outcomes because of better compliance, more disclosure, stronger placebo effect, and more physicians' trustworthy behaviors. Patients' autonomy may also impact on health outcomes and is increasingly being emphasized in health care. However, despite the critical role of trust and autonomy, patients that naïvely trust their physicians may become overly dependent and lack the motivation to participate in medical care. In this article, we argue that increased trust does not necessarily imply decreased autonomy. Furthermore, patients with high levels of trust and autonomy preferences are most likely to have the best health outcomes. We propose a framework for understanding simultaneous trust and autonomy preferences and for recognizing their interactive effects on health outcomes in the dynamic medical encounter. This framework argues that policy makers and health care providers should make efforts to foster not only patients' trust but also their preferences for autonomy and thus gain the best position for achieving health-related goals.
Similar articles
-
Do patient autonomy preferences matter? Linking patient-centered care to patient-physician relationships and health outcomes.Soc Sci Med. 2010 Nov;71(10):1811-8. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.08.008. Epub 2010 Sep 15. Soc Sci Med. 2010. PMID: 20933316
-
Autonomy, Trust, and Respect.J Med Philos. 2016 Feb;41(1):10-24. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhv036. Epub 2015 Dec 13. J Med Philos. 2016. PMID: 26668168 Free PMC article.
-
Volitional Trust, Autonomy Satisfaction, and Engagement at Work.Psychol Rep. 2018 Feb;121(1):112-134. doi: 10.1177/0033294117718555. Epub 2017 Jul 5. Psychol Rep. 2018. PMID: 28679333
-
Linking patients' trust in physicians to health outcomes.Br J Hosp Med (Lond). 2008 Jan;69(1):42-6. doi: 10.12968/hmed.2008.69.1.28040. Br J Hosp Med (Lond). 2008. PMID: 18293731 Review.
-
Anticipated changes in the doctor-patient relationship in the managed care and managed competition of the Health Security Act of 1993.Arch Fam Med. 1994 Aug;3(8):665-71. doi: 10.1001/archfami.3.8.665. Arch Fam Med. 1994. PMID: 7952251 Review.
Cited by
-
Perspectives on Research Participation and Facilitation Among Dialysis Patients, Clinic Personnel, and Medical Providers: A Focus Group Study.Am J Kidney Dis. 2018 Jul;72(1):93-103. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2017.10.011. Epub 2017 Dec 27. Am J Kidney Dis. 2018. PMID: 29289476 Free PMC article.
-
Mature or Emerging? The Impact of Treatment-Related Internet Health Information Seeking on Patients' Trust in Physicians.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Aug 28;15(9):1855. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15091855. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018. PMID: 30154309 Free PMC article.
-
Patient-Physician End-of-Life Discussions in the Routine Care of Medicare Beneficiaries.J Aging Health. 2015 Sep;27(6):983-1002. doi: 10.1177/0898264315569458. Epub 2015 Feb 2. J Aging Health. 2015. PMID: 25649675 Free PMC article.
-
A systematic review of patient access to medical records in the acute setting: practicalities, perspectives and ethical consequences.BMC Med Ethics. 2020 Mar 2;21(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12910-020-0459-6. BMC Med Ethics. 2020. PMID: 32122332 Free PMC article.
-
Erosion of Trust in the Medical Profession in India: Time for Doctors to Act.Int J Health Policy Manag. 2017 Jan 1;6(1):5-8. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2016.143. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2017. PMID: 28005537 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical