Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1991 Oct 1;145(7):807-14.

Use of reminders for preventive procedures in family medicine

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Use of reminders for preventive procedures in family medicine

W W Rosser et al. CMAJ. .

Abstract

Objective: To compare the effectiveness of three computerized reminder systems in the delivery of five preventive procedures in family practice.

Design: Prospective, randomized, controlled study.

Setting: Ottawa Civic Hospital Family Medicine Centre.

Participants: Of 8502 patients 15 years of age or more who were not in a hospital or institution 5883 were randomly assigned, by family, to a control group, a physician reminder group (passive) or a telephone or letter reminder group (active). The remaining 2619 patients were not included in the randomized portion of the study but were monitored.

Intervention: During 1 year the patients in the active reminder groups received a telephone call or letter reminding them of any overdue preventive procedures; for those in the passive reminder group the physician was reminded at an office visit to provide any overdue service.

Outcome measure: Rates of completion of the preventive procedures required.

Main results: All three reminder systems significantly improved the delivery of preventive services (p less than 0.001). The procedure completion rates were 42.0% in the letter reminder group, 42.0% in the telephone reminder group, 33.7% in the physician reminder group and 14.1% in the randomized control group. The use of a letter was more cost-effective than the telephone system, but the physician reminder system was the most cost-effective.

Conclusion: Computerized reminder systems do improve the delivery of preventive services in family practice.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. J Fam Pract. 1979 Oct;9(4):727-30 - PubMed
    1. J Fam Pract. 1979 Jul;9(1):57-64 - PubMed
    1. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1972 Mar;22(116):172-5 - PubMed
    1. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw. 1968 Apr;75(4):392-404 - PubMed
    1. J Fam Pract. 1981 Apr;12(4):657-60 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources