Laparoscopic vs vaginal hysterectomy for benign pathology
- PMID: 19136094
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.09.016
Laparoscopic vs vaginal hysterectomy for benign pathology
Abstract
Objective: The objective of the study was to compare length of stay, blood loss, operative time, and pain of laparoscopic and vaginal hysterectomy.
Study design: This was a prospective, randomized, controlled comparison between vaginal (VH) and laparoscopic (LH) hysterectomy among 60 consecutive patients with a uterine volume of 300 mL or less and without uterine prolapse. Patients were followed up for 12 months.
Results: The groups were significantly different for mean operative time (VH: 81 +/- 30 minutes; LH: 99 +/- 25 minutes; P = .033) and blood loss (LH: 83 +/- 57 mL; VH: 178 +/- 149 mL; P = .004). Bilateral adnexectomy was performed when preoperatively planned in 73% of cases of the vaginal arm, whereas it was always performed in the laparoscopic arm (P = .045). Postoperative pain on day 0 and the number of days of analgesic request were higher in the vaginal group (P = .023 and P = .017, respectively). LH was associated with a reduced hospital stay (LH: 2.7 +/- 0.5 days; VH: 3.2 +/- 0.6 days; P < .001).There were no differences between the groups at the follow-up.
Conclusion: Laparoscopic hysterectomy results in a shorter hospital stay, less blood loss, and less postoperative pain compared with vaginal hysterectomy.
Comment in
-
Discussion: 'Laparoscopic versus vaginal hysterectomy for benign pathology' by Candiani et al.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Apr;200(4):e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.01.024. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009. PMID: 19318159 No abstract available.
-
Laparoscopy vs vaginal hysterectomy with culdolaparoscopy oophorectomy.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 May;202(5):e7; author reply e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.11.003. Epub 2009 Dec 29. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010. PMID: 20042174 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical